Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22828912›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2012

Recent progress in mucosal vaccine development: potential and limitations.

Nils Lycke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 423 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
423citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
25.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

423 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 777 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mucosal immunity and vaccine development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Gut distress and interventionFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. [Molecular mechanisms of chronic gastric mucosal inflammation induced byZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Extracellular Vesicles ofJournal of extracellular biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Materials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Pharmaceutics · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

363 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nils LyckeCenter for Mucosal Immunobiology and Vaccines (MIVAC), Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. nils.lycke@microbio.gu.se
Institute for Biomedicine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most pathogens access the body through the mucosal membranes. Therefore, effective vaccines that protect at these sites are much needed. However, despite early success with the live attenuated oral polio vaccine over 50 years ago, only a few new mucosal vaccines have been subsequently launched. This is partly due to problems with developing safe and effective mucosal adjuvants. In the past decade, however, the successful development of live attenuated mucosal vaccines against influenza virus and rotavirus infections has boosted interest in this field, and great expectations for new mucosal vaccines lie ahead. Here, I discuss the expanding knowledge and strategies used in the development of mucosal vaccines.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicHumansImmunity, MucosalInfluenza VaccinesMucous MembraneRotavirus VaccinesVaccinationVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicInfluenza VaccinesRotavirus VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID22828912
OpenAlexW1966823964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.