Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22828801›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmacology2012

Casting a wider net: whole-cell assays to capture varied and biased signaling.

Terry Kenakin

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Terry KenakinDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 120 Mason Farm Rd., Room 4042 Genetic Medicine Building, CB#7365, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7365, USA. kenakin@email.unc.edu
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The observation of complex receptor behaviors has shown how ligands can have multiple efficacies and can also differentially stimulate certain cellular signaling pathways over others (i.e., biased signaling). Conventional pharmacological assays (usually proximal to the receptor) will detect ligands that produce the signal defined by the assay (i.e., Ca²⁺, cAMP, and others) but otherwise may miss biased ligands that produce little activation of pathways not measured by the assay. In theory, this is less of a hazard for generic whole-cell assays, which may be sensitive to multiple signaling inputs. Whole-cell assays have the advantage of detecting effects induced by a variety of receptor interactions with cytosolic proteins, including those that may be previously unknown. These ideas are discussed within the context of the high-throughput flow cytometry measurement of receptor internalization described by Wu et al. in the current issue of the journal. The internalization of receptors can be a useful therapeutic modality and the article by Wu et al. illustrates how this new assay, targeted to downstream cellular effects, can uncover unique ligand efficacies linked to receptor internalization.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledSmall Molecule LibrariesReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID22828801
OpenAlexW2138214134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.