Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2012
Randomised controlled trial of colostrum to improve intestinal function in patients with short bowel syndrome.
Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effects of Colostrum Bovinum Supplementation on Human Body Fat Content and/or Blood Lipid Profile: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Digestible and Metabolizable Energy Intake in Humans: a Systematic Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Pooled it
- Therapeutics effects of bovine colostrum applications on gastrointestinal diseases: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Science and Faith to Understand Milk Bioactivity for Infants.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Nutritional Management of Intestinal Failure due to Short Bowel Syndrome in Children.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Colostrum Therapy for Human Gastrointestinal Health and Disease.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Review
- Nutritional Feeding Strategies in Pediatric Intestinal Failure.Nutrients · 2020Review
- Randomized controlled clinical trial on the effect of oral immunoglobulin supplementation on neonatal dairy calves with diarrhea.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2019Article
- Network-Based Selection of Candidate Markers and Assays to Assess the Impact of Oral Immune Interventions on Gut Functions.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- Preventive effects of bovine colostrum supplementation in TNBS-induced colitis in mice.PloS one · 2018Article
- Animal models of gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Animal models of infant short bowel syndrome: translational relevance and challenges.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesColostrum is rich in immunoregulatory, antimicrobial and trophic components supporting intestinal development and function in newborns. We assessed whether bovine colostrum could enhance intestinal adaptation and function in adult short bowel syndrome (SBS) patients. SUBJECTS/
methodsTwelve SBS patients in this randomised cross-over study received 4 weeks oral supplement of bovine colostrum or an iso-energetic and iso-proteinaceous control (2.4 MJ/d, 500 ml/day) separated by a 4-week washout period. Patients were admitted four times for 72-h periods of fluid, electrolyte and nutrient balance studies. Meals, faeces and urine were weighed, and energy, macronutrient and electrolyte contents were analysed to calculate net nutrient uptake. Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans, and functional tests of handgrip strength and lung functions were performed. Eight patients completed the study and were included in the analysis.
resultsBoth supplements (colostrum and control) not only increased protein (0.96 ± 0.42 MJ/d, P=0.004 1.03 ± 0.44 MJ/d, P=0.003) and energy (1.46 ± 1.02 MJ/d, P=0.005, 1.76 ± 1.46 MJ/d, P=0.01) absorption but also absolute faecal wet weight excretions (231 ± 248 g/d, P=0.002, 319 ± 299 g/d, P=0.03), compared with baseline measurements. Both supplements improved handgrip strength (P=0.03) while only the control supplement increased lean body mass (1.12 ± 1.33 kg, P<0.049). Colostrum was not found to be superior to the control.
conclusionIntake of high-protein milk supplements increased net nutrient absorption for adult SBS patients, but at the expense of increased diarrhoea. Despite high contents of bioactive factors, colostrum did not significantly improve intestinal absorption, body composition or functional tests compared with the control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.