Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22828606›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2012

Association between patient and general practice characteristics and unplanned first-time admissions for cancer: observational study.

A Bottle, C Tsang, C Parsons, A Majeed, M Soljak, P Aylin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Delays in referral from primary care worsen survival for patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Response to "Identification of appropriate and potentially avoidable emergency department referrals in a tertiary cancer care center" by Duflos et al.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Emergency hospital admissions for asthma and access to primary care: cross-sectional analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A BottleFaculty of Medicine, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK. robert.bottle@imperial.ac.uk
C Tsang
C Parsons
A Majeed
M Soljak
P Aylin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo identify patient and general practice (GP) characteristics associated with emergency (unplanned) first admissions for cancer in secondary care.

methodsPatients who had a first-time admission with a primary diagnosis of cancer during 2007/08 to 2009/10 were identified from administrative hospital data. We modelled the associations between the odds of these admissions being unplanned and various patient and GP practice characteristics using national data sets, including the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF).

resultsThere were 639,064 patients with a first-time admission for cancer, with 139,351 unplanned, from 7957 GP practices. The unplanned proportion ranged from 13.9% (patients aged 15-44 years) to 44.9% (patients aged 85 years and older, P<0.0001), with large variation by ethnicity (highest in Asians), deprivation, rurality and cancer type. In unadjusted analyses, all included patient and practice-level variables were statistically significant predictors of the admissions being unplanned. After adjustment, patient area-level deprivation was a key factor (most deprived compared with least deprived quintile OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.32-1.40). Higher total QOF performance protected against unplanned admission (OR 0.94 per 100 points; 95% CI 0.91-0.97); having no GPs with a UK primary medical qualification (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.11) and being less able to offer appointments within 48 h were associated with higher odds.

conclusionWe have identified some patient and practice characteristics associated with a first-time admission for cancer being unplanned. The former could be used to help identify patients at high risk, while the latter raise questions about the role of practice organisation and staff training.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolEmergenciesFemaleGeneral PracticeHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID22828606
PMCPMC3494442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.