ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2012
Realistic enzymology for post-translational modification: zero-order ultrasensitivity revisited.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermodynamic bounds on ultrasensitivity in covalent switching.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- The linear framework: using graph theory to reveal the algebra and thermodynamics of biomolecular systems.Interface focus · 2022Review
- Emergence and Enhancement of Ultrasensitivity through Posttranslational Modulation of Protein Stability.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Crosstalk and ultrasensitivity in protein degradation pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Robustness and parameter geography in post-translational modification systems.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- The effect of site-to-site variability in ultrasensitive dose responses.Journal of mathematical biology · 2017Article
- Ultrasensitivity and fluctuations in the Barkai-Leibler model of chemotaxis receptors in Escherichia coli.PloS one · 2017Article
- Laplacian Dynamics with Synthesis and Degradation.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2015Article
- Paradoxical results in perturbation-based signaling network reconstruction.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- A fundamental trade-off in covalent switching and its circumvention by enzyme bifunctionality in glucose homeostasis.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
- Enhancement of tunability of MAPK cascade due to coexistence of processive and distributive phosphorylation mechanisms.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- Time-scale separation--Michaelis and Menten's old idea, still bearing fruit.The FEBS journal · 2014Review
- Ultrasensitive response motifs: basic amplifiers in molecular signalling networks.Open biology · 2013Review
- Dimerization and bifunctionality confer robustness to the isocitrate dehydrogenase regulatory system in Escherichia coli.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Article
- Post-translational modification: nature's escape from genetic imprisonment and the basis for dynamic information encoding.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unlimited ultrasensitivity in a kinase/phosphatase "futile cycle" has been a paradigmatic example of collective behaviour in multi-enzyme systems. However, its analysis has relied on the Michaelis-Menten reaction mechanism, which remains widely used despite a century of new knowledge. Modifying and demodifying enzymes accomplish different biochemical tasks; the donor that contributes the modifying group is often ignored without the impact of this time-scale separation being taken into account; and new forms of reversible modification are now known. We exploit new algebraic methods of steady-state analysis to reconcile the analysis of multi-enzyme systems with single-enzyme biochemistry using zero-order ultrasensitivity as an example. We identify the property of "strong irreversibility", in which product re-binding is disallowed. We show that unlimited ultrasensitivity is preserved for a class of complex, strongly irreversible reaction mechanisms and determine the corresponding saturation conditions. We show further that unlimited ultrasensitivity arises from a singularity in a novel "invariant" that summarises the algebraic relationship between modified and unmodified substrate. We find that this singularity also underlies knife-edge behaviour in allocation of substrate between modification states, which has implications for the coherence of futile cycles within an integrated tissue. When the enzymes are irreversible, but not strongly so, the singularity disappears in the form found here and unlimited ultrasensitivity may no longer be preserved. The methods introduced here are widely applicable to other reversible modification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.