Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22826714›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2012

Evolution of the land plant exocyst complexes.

Fatima Cvrčková, Michal Grunt, Radek Bezvoda, Michal Hála, Ivan Kulich, Anamika Rawat, Viktor Zárský

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome-wide identification of theFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The exocyst in context.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Relevance of the Exocyst in ArabidopsisInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatima CvrčkováDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal GruntDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic.
Radek BezvodaDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal HálaDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic.
Ivan KulichDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic.
Anamika RawatDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic.
Viktor ZárskýDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exocyst is an evolutionarily conserved vesicle tethering complex functioning especially in the last stage of exocytosis. Homologs of its eight canonical subunits - Sec3, Sec5, Sec6, Sec8, Sec10, Sec15, Exo70, and Exo84 - were found also in higher plants and confirmed to form complexes in vivo, and to participate in cell growth including polarized expansion of pollen tubes and root hairs. Here we present results of a phylogenetic study of land plant exocyst subunits encoded by a selection of completely sequenced genomes representing a variety of plant, mostly angiosperm, lineages. According to their evolution histories, plant exocyst subunits can be divided into several groups. The core subunits Sec6, Sec8, and Sec10, together with Sec3 and Sec5, underwent few, if any fixed duplications in the tracheophytes (though they did amplify in the moss Physcomitrella patens), while others form larger families, with the number of paralogs ranging typically from two to eight per genome (Sec15, Exo84) to several dozens per genome (Exo70). Most of the diversity, which can be in some cases traced down to the origins of land plants, can be attributed to the peripheral subunits Exo84 and, in particular, Exo70. As predicted previously, early land plants (including possibly also the Rhyniophytes) encoded three ancestral Exo70 paralogs which further diversified in the course of land plant evolution. Our results imply that plants do not have a single "Exocyst complex" - instead, they appear to possess a diversity of exocyst variants unparalleled among other organisms studied so far. This feature might perhaps be directly related to the demands of building and maintenance of the complicated and spatially diverse structures of the endomembranes and cell surfaces in multicellular land plants.

Indexed as

co-evolutionexocystgene duplicationland plantsphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID22826714
PMCPMC3399122
OpenAlexW2146949085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.