Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22826698›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroengineering2012

Reprogramming movements: extraction of motor intentions from cortical ensemble activity when movement goals change.

Peter J Ifft, Mikhail A Lebedev, Miguel A L Nicolelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroengineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interfacing to the brain's motor decisions.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Motor cortical correlates of arm resting in the context of a reaching task and implications for prosthetic control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Toward high performance, weakly invasive brain computer interfaces using selective visual attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter J IfftDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Durham, NC, USA.
Mikhail A Lebedev
Miguel A L Nicolelis

Funding

Dorsal Column Stimulation as a New Therapy for Motor DisordersR01NS073125 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 2010 to 2014
$3.8M
Interval Timing and Motor Programming by Cortico-Striatal EnsemblesR01NS073952 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
A Virtual Reality Simulator to Study VLSBA and Test Brain-Actuating TechnologiesDP1MH099903 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 2012 to 2014
$2.3M
A Virtual Reality Simulator to Study VLSBA and Test Brain-Actuating TechnologiesDP1OD006798 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 2010 to 2011
$1.6M
Sensorized Neural ProstheticRC1HD063390 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLELIS, MIGUEL A. L. · 2009 to 2010
$998k
NICHD NIH HHS RC1 HD063390NIH HHS DP1 OD006798NIMH NIH HHS DP1 MH099903NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073125NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to inhibit unwanted movements and change motor plans is essential for behaviors of advanced organisms. The neural mechanisms by which the primate motor system rejects undesired actions have received much attention during the last decade, but it is not well understood how this neural function could be utilized to improve the efficiency of brain-machine interfaces (BMIs). Here we employed linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and a Wiener filter to extract motor plan transitions from the activity of ensembles of sensorimotor cortex neurons. Two rhesus monkeys, chronically implanted with multielectrode arrays in primary motor (M1) and primary sensory (S1) cortices, were overtrained to produce reaching movements with a joystick toward visual targets upon their presentation. Then, the behavioral task was modified to include a distracting target that flashed for 50, 150, or 250 ms (25% of trials each) followed by the true target that appeared at a different screen location. In the remaining 25% of trials, the initial target stayed on the screen and was the target to be approached. M1 and S1 neuronal activity represented both the true and distracting targets, even for the shortest duration of the distracting event. This dual representation persisted both when the monkey initiated movements toward the distracting target and then made corrections and when they moved directly toward the second, true target. The Wiener filter effectively decoded the location of the true target, whereas the LDA classifier extracted the location of both targets from ensembles of 50-250 neurons. Based on these results, we suggest developing real-time BMIs that inhibit unwanted movements represented by brain activity while enacting the desired motor outcome concomitantly.

Indexed as

brain-machine interfacesdecision makingmonkeymotor cortexneurophysiologyneuroprostheticssensorimotor transformationvolitional inhibition

Identifiers

PMID22826698
PMCPMC3399119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.