Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22826620›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2012

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: complications and inflammatory response.

Jan Martínek, Ondřej Ryska, Tereza Filípková, Radek Doležel, Stefan Juhas, Jan Motlík, Monika Holubová, Vladimír Nosek, Barbora Rotnáglová, Miroslav Zavoral and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan MartínekDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Military Hospital, 16000 Prague, Charles University, Czech Republic. jan.martinek@volny.cz
Ondřej Ryska
Tereza Filípková
Radek Doležel
Stefan Juhas
Jan Motlík
Monika Holubová
Vladimír Nosek
Barbora Rotnáglová
Miroslav Zavoral
Miroslav Ryska
Charles University · CZ

Funding

BCL-2, APOPTOTIC GATEWAY TO ISCHEMIC CELL DEATHF32NS009994 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI ANTONAWICH, FRANCIS J · 1997 to 1998
–
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS009994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vs standard laparoscopic ovariectomy in mini pigs with respect to technical aspects, complications and parameters of systemic inflammatory response.

methodsThis was a randomized, experimental, survival study. Ten female mini pigs underwent NOTES transgastric ovariectomy (NOTES group) and ten female mini pigs underwent laparoscopic ovariectomy (LAP group). A "percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" approach with guidewire and sphincterotome was used for gastrotomy creation. The ovary was resected using standard biopsy forceps and a snare. The access site was closed using a "KING" closure with a single endoloop and several clips. In the laparoscopic group, a three-port laparoscopy and an ovariectomy were performed with the use of standard laparoscopic devices. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count and interleukin (IL)-6 plasma levels were used as indicators of systemic inflammatory response. All animals were euthanized 28 d after surgery.

resultsAll animals survived without complications. The mean procedure time was 41.3 min ± 17.6 min (NOTES group) and 25.7 min ± 5.25 min (LAP group, P < 0.02). Postmortem examinations demonstrated that 50% and 70% of animals were free of any complications in the NOTES and LAP groups, respectively. The remaining animals developed minor complications (adhesions) in a comparable frequency between the two groups. In the NOTES group, one animal developed a small intramural gastric abscess close to the gastrotomy site. A minor serous exudate that was present in 50% and 40% of the animals in the NOTES and laparoscopy groups, respectively, was not considered a complication. In both groups CRP levels increased significantly on the 2nd and 7th postoperative days (POD) and returned to normal after 28 d. On POD 2, an increase of CRP level was significantly higher in the NOTES group compared to the LAP group. Values of IL-6 did not differ from baseline values in either of the groups postoperatively. Interestingly, the platelet count decreased significantly on POD 2, but returned close to baseline values on POD 7 and PODs 28-30.

conclusionBoth NOTES and laparoscopic ovariectomies had a similar frequency of minor complications. However, the NOTES technique produced an increased systemic inflammatory response on POD 2.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinEquipment DesignFemaleInflammationInflammation MediatorsInterleukin-6LaparoscopyLeukocyte CountNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryOvariectomyPlatelet CountSurgical InstrumentsSwineSwine, MiniatureBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinInflammation MediatorsInterleukin-6LaparoscopyNatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgeryOvariectomySystemic inflammatory response

Identifiers

PMID22826620
PMCPMC3400857
OpenAlexW2139506244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.