Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22826236›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Transcription factors ETS2 and MESP1 transdifferentiate human dermal fibroblasts into cardiac progenitors.

Jose Francisco Islas, Yu Liu, Kuo-Chan Weng, Matthew J Robertson, Shuxing Zhang, Allan Prejusa, John Harger, Dariya Tikhomirova, Mani Chopra, Dinakar Iyer and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Induction of human cardiomyocyte-like cells from fibroblasts by defined factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Trial
  3. Advances in fibroblast-based cardiac reprogramming in the treatment of heart disease.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. STEMIN and YAP5SA, the future of heart repair?Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Cellular reprogramming of fibroblasts in heart regeneration.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Direct Cardiac Reprogramming: Current Status and Future Prospects.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Direct reprogramming induces vascular regeneration post muscle ischemic injury.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jose Francisco IslasGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Bioscience and Technology, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Yu Liu
Kuo-Chan Weng
Matthew J Robertson
Shuxing Zhang
Allan Prejusa
John Harger
Dariya Tikhomirova
Mani Chopra
Dinakar Iyer
Mark Mercola
Robert G Oshima
James T Willerson
Vladimir N Potaman
Robert J Schwartz
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital · USUniversity of Houston · USSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute · USBaylor College of Medicine · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unique insights for the reprograming of cell lineages have come from embryonic development in the ascidian Ciona, which is dependent upon the transcription factors Ci-ets1/2 and Ci-mesp to generate cardiac progenitors. We tested the idea that mammalian v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 2 (ETS2) and mesoderm posterior (MESP) homolog may be used to convert human dermal fibroblasts into cardiac progenitors. Here we show that murine ETS2 has a critical role in directing cardiac progenitors during cardiopoiesis in embryonic stem cells. We then use lentivirus-mediated forced expression of human ETS2 to convert normal human dermal fibroblasts into replicative cells expressing the cardiac mesoderm marker KDR(+). However, although neither ETS2 nor the purported cardiac master regulator MESP1 can by themselves generate cardiac progenitors de novo from fibroblasts, forced coexpression of ETS2 and MESP1 or cell treatment with purified proteins reprograms fibroblasts into cardiac progenitors, as shown by the de novo appearance of core cardiac transcription factors, Ca(2+) transients, and sarcomeres. Our data indicate that ETS2 and MESP1 play important roles in a genetic network that governs cardiopoiesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBlotting, WesternCell TransdifferentiationFibroblastsFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Knockout TechniquesHumansMiceMyoblasts, CardiacPolymerase Chain ReactionProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-2Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSkinBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsETS2 protein, humanEts2 protein, mouseMesp1 protein, mouseProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-2

Identifiers

PMID22826236
PMCPMC3420197
OpenAlexW2072351477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.