Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22825964›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2012

Management of acute renal dysfunction in sepsis.

Federico Nalesso, Zaccaria Ricci, Claudio Ronco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federico NalessoDepartment of Nephrology, St. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy, nalesso.federico@gmail.com.
Zaccaria Ricci
Claudio Ronco
Ospedale San Bortolo · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) often complicates sepsis, leading to greater complexity and a worsening prognosis. Advances in the clinical management of sepsis may have secondary benefits with respect to renal outcomes. In critically ill patients, this disorder typically produces multiple organ dysfunction. Among the several disorders encountered in sepsis, AKI is one of the most important because it is a life-threatening condition, increases the complexity and cost of care, and is an independent risk factor for mortality. The potential interventions in sepsis-related AKI consist of effective prevention/protection strategies for the kidney in patients at risk, early recognition and attenuation of renal damage, pathophysiology-driven pharmacologic support, efficient extracorporeal blood purification therapy, and strategies that promote recovery of renal function. Existing and hybrid extracorporeal therapies are being investigated not only as means to replace lost kidney function, but also to modulate the immune response to sepsis.

Identifiers

PMID22825964
OpenAlexW2085694827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.