Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22825918›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2012

Drug-coated balloons for coronary and peripheral interventional procedures.

Jochen Wöhrle

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06373601 (Selution Sirolimus Coated Balloon), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06373601 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Selution Sirolimus Coated Balloon (MedAlliance) Versus SeQuent Please Neo Paclitaxel Coated Balloon (Bbraun) for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions in Medium-small Size Vessels.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Evidence per Attività e Ricerche Cardiovascolari ONLUSRan2024 to 2027Enrolled140ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Stenosis Coronary, Coronary Artery Lesion, Percutaneous Coronary InterventionArmssirolimus-eluting balloon (Selution), paclitaxel-eluting balloon (SeQuent Please Neo)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Endovascular Drug Delivery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Direct Pulmonary Vein Ablation With Stenosis Prevention Therapy.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2015
    Article
  8. Local drug delivery to prevent restenosis.Journal of vascular surgery · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jochen WöhrleClinic of Internal Medicine II, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Jochen.woehrle@uniklinik-ulm.de
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty reduces neointimal proliferation, restenosis, and clinical need for target lesion revascularization (TLR). PCB was superior for coronary restenosis in bare-metal and drug-eluting stents compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty and was noninferior compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents. PCB angioplasty should be considered for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis. For de novo lesions, PCB plus endothelial progenitor cell capturing stents reduced restenosis and TLR in early reports. Among patients with de novo lesions and diabetes, the combination of PCB plus bare-metal stent revealed similar results in lesions compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents. The early results for PCB in small vessels are also very encouraging. Dual antiplatelet therapy duration may be shorter with PCB angioplasty compared with drug-eluting stents. Nevertheless, the risk for thrombotic vessel occlusion is minimized. Considering peripheral arterial disease, PCB angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions was superior to uncoated balloon angioplasty. Registries indicate PCB to also be effective in lesions below the knee. Since there is no certain class effect, efficacy and safety have to be demonstrated for different types of PCB for coronary and peripheral interventions.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCoronary RestenosisDrug-Eluting StentsHumansPaclitaxelStentsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID22825918
OpenAlexW2069214023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.