ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2012
Design and implementation of a microelectrode assembly for use on noncontact in situ electroporation of adherent cells.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging electric current stimulation and chemical induction to enhance MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes.Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Ultralong-Time Recovery and Low-Voltage Electroporation for Biological Cell Monitoring Enabled by a Microsized Multipulse Framework.ACS omega · 2021Article
- In situ electroporation of mammalian cells through SiOScientific reports · 2021Article
- Delivery of Foreign Materials into Adherent Cells by Gold Nanoparticle-Mediated Photoporation.Membranes · 2021Article
- High Throughput and Highly Controllable Methods for In Vitro Intracellular Delivery.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020Review
- Uniform electric field generation in circular multi-well culture plates using polymeric inserts.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Electroporation on microchips: the harmful effects of pH changes and scaling down.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In situ electroporation of adherent cells provides significant advantages with respect to electroporation systems for suspension cells, such as causing minimal stress to cultured cells and simplifying and saving several steps within the process. In this study, a new electrode assembly design is shown and applied to in situ electroporate adherent cell lines growing in standard multiwell plates. We designed an interdigitated array of electrodes patterned on copper with printed circuit board technology and covered with nickel/gold. Small interelectrode distances were used to achieve effective electroporation with low voltages. Epoxy-based microseparators were constructed to avoid direct contact with the cells and to create more uniform electric fields. The device was successful in the electropermeabilization of two different adherent cell lines, C2C12 and HEK 293, as assessed by the intracellular delivery of the fluorescent dextran FD20S. Additionally, as a collateral effect, we observed cell electrofusion in HEK 293 cells, thus making this device also useful for performing cell fusion. In summary, we show the effectiveness of this minimally invasive device for electroporation of adherent cells cultured in standard multiwell plates. The cheap technologies used in the fabrication process of the electrode assembly indicate potential use as a low-cost, disposable device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22825716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.