ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2012
Intensive home haemodialysis: benefits and barriers.
Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on Haemodialysis.BMC nephrology · 2019Guideline
- Illness Beliefs in End Stage Renal Disease and Associations with Self-Care Modality Choice.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Observational
- Proximity care pathways and digitalization: opportunities and concerns for medication safety management-Insights from the ProSafe study on community perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The Burden of Home Dialysis: An Overlooked Challenge.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2024Review
- Home hemodialysis technique survival: insights and challenges.BMC nephrology · 2023Review
- Two Years' Experience of Intensive Home Hemodialysis with the Physidia SJournal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Main Barriers to the Introduction of a Home Haemodialysis Programme in Poland: A Review of the Challenges for Implementation and Criteria for a Successful Programme.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Understanding Home Hemodialysis Patient Attrition: A Cohort Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2021Article
- The Potential Burden of Home Dialysis on Patients and Caregivers: A Narrative Review.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2019Review
- Article
- Association of Vascular Access Type with Mortality, Hospitalization, and Transfer to In-Center Hemodialysis in Patients Undergoing Home Hemodialysis.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2016Observational
- A 4-month programme of in-centre nocturnal haemodialysis was associated with improvements in patient outcomes.Clinical kidney journal · 2015Article
- The changing landscape of home dialysis in the United States.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2014Review
- Clinical outcome of home hemodialysis in patients with previous peritoneal dialysis exposure: evaluation of the integrated home dialysis model.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal DialysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence of the benefits of intensive home haemodialysis has led to increased international interest in this modality as a viable option for renal replacement therapy. Until the late 1970s, haemodialysis was primarily performed at home; however, the development of in-centre and satellite dialysis units and the advent of peritoneal dialysis led to decreased numbers of patients being managed by home haemodialysis. Over the past decade, a move towards once again providing and supporting haemodialysis at home has emerged, due to a desire to offer a more convenient form of dialysis for the patient in a more cost-effective manner. This shift has generated clinical evidence indicating benefits both from receiving haemodialysis at home, and from the option to provide intensive dialysis treatment in this setting. With the development of new home haemodialysis programs, specific patient-related, physician-related and cost-related barriers to their introduction have been encountered, including patient fear of self-cannulation and lack of expert medical knowledge in the area. This Review discusses the benefits and barriers associated with intensive home haemodialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.