Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22825532›Full record

ArticleCritical pathways in cardiology2012

Design and implementation of a stand-alone chest pain evaluation center within an academic emergency department.

David E Winchester, Dhane Stomp, Roger Y Shifrin, Preeti Jois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical pathways in cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David E WinchesterDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32610-0277, USA. dwinches@ufl.edu
Dhane Stomp
Roger Y Shifrin
Preeti Jois
University of Florida · US

Funding

UF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDUL1RR029890 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2009 to 2011
$14.4M
NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1RR029890NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest pain is a common presenting symptom for emergency department (ED) patients; however, a thorough cardiac evaluation can be difficult to complete within the ED setting. Implementation of a stand-alone unit for the evaluation of chest pain may improve care for patients with chest pain. We designed a protocol for identifying patients without an acute coronary syndrome and with low-to-intermediate likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). These patients were monitored in a stand-alone chest pain evaluation center (CPEC) staffed with a small group of providers and tested for CAD, if necessary. In the first 6 weeks of operation, 181 patients were evaluated in the CPEC. The prevalence of CAD risk factors was low. Of the 181 patients, 159 (88%) were discharged home and 22 (12%) required admission to the hospital for further care. We compared the number of chest pain evaluations and admissions for first 6 weeks of operation to the same 6-week period from the 2 previous years. Whereas ED chest pain evaluations increased 66% over the 2-year time frame, the proportion admitted to the hospital decreased from 53% to 42% (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, evidence-based evaluation of chest pain in patients without acute coronary syndrome and with low-to-intermediate likelihood of obstructive CAD can result in the significant majority of patients being discharged from the ED. Creation of a stand-alone CPEC in an academic hospital was associated with a significant reduction in hospital admissions.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultChest PainCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCritical PathwaysElectrocardiographyEmergency Service, HospitalEvidence-Based Emergency MedicineExercise TestFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID22825532
PMCPMC3404430
OpenAlexW1984838034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.