ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2012
Changes in kinematic variables at various muscle lengths of human elbow flexors following eccentric exercise.
Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of repeated eccentric exercise on muscle damage markers and motor unit control strategies in arm and hand muscle.Sports medicine and health science · 2022Article
- Expression of tissue remodelling, inflammation- and angiogenesis-related factors after eccentric exercise in humans.Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- Heart Failure-Induced Skeletal Muscle Wasting.Current heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Multilevel Models for the Analysis of Angle-Specific Torque Curves with Application to Master Athletes.Journal of human kinetics · 2015Article
- Editorial on special issue "lifestyle and ageing in muscle disease".Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exercise-induced muscle damage causes a disproportionally larger drop in maximal force when measured at short versus optimal or long muscle lengths, resulting in a shift of the length (angle)-force relationship towards longer lengths. However, little attention has been given to the potential effect of this shift on the rate of force development (RFD) and isotonic function at different muscle lengths. This study examined RFD at various elbow angles and kinematic variables at two different ranges of elbow flexion, so as to include mainly the ascending (S condition) or the descending limb (L condition) of the angle-force curve, following eccentric exercise. Seven male volunteers performed an eccentric exercise protocol with the elbow flexors, which caused significant changes in indicators of muscle damage (P < 0.05-0.001). Optimum angle for force generation was significantly shifted towards longer elbow flexors lengths post exercise (P < 0.05-0.01). RFD was significantly decreased at all the angles tested but no differences were revealed between angles (P < 0.05-0.001). The kinematic variables measured were also significantly impaired following eccentric damage (P < 0.05-0.001). Maximal isotonic force showed a greater impairment in the S condition, however no significant differences between the S and L condition were found in maximal angular velocity (MAV) and time, angle and isotonic force needed to achieve MAV. These results suggest that impairment of RFD following muscle damage is not muscle-length dependent and the rightward shift of the angle-force curve is not the determinant of the decline in either RFD or the isotonic performance at the different ranges of the elbow flexion movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22825493What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.