Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22825360›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2013

Nutritional management and growth in children with chronic kidney disease.

Lesley Rees, Helen Jones

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of Dietary Micronutrient Intake and the Metabolome in Children with CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Monitoring dialysis adequacy: history and current practice.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Growth plate alterations in chronic kidney disease.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lesley ReesDepartment of Nephrology, Gt Ormond St Hospital for Children Foundation Trust, Gt Ormond St, London, WC1N 3JH, UK. Pediatric_Nephrology@ucl.ac.uk
Helen Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite continuing improvements in our understanding of the causes of poor growth in chronic kidney disease, many unanswered questions remain: why do some patients maintain a good appetite whereas others have profound anorexia at a similar level of renal function? Why do some, but not all, patients respond to increased nutritional intake? Is feed delivery by gastrostomy superior to oral and nasogastric routes? Do children who are no longer in the 'infancy' stage of growth benefit from enteral feeding? Do patients with protein energy wasting benefit from increased nutritional input? How do we prevent obesity, which is becoming so prevalent in the developed world? This review will address these issues.

Indexed as

Body HeightChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusAdolescentAdolescent Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAge FactorsAppetite RegulationChildChild, PreschoolGrowth DisordersHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional SupportObesity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.