Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22825353›Full record

ReviewBioengineered

Increasing the range of drug targets: interacting peptides provide leads for the development of oncoprotein inhibitors.

Bernd Groner, Axel Weber, Laura Mack

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PTAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. LMPID: a manually curated database of linear motifs mediating protein-protein interactions.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Peptide aptamers: development and applications.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2015
    Review
  14. Targeting survivin in cancer: novel drug development approaches.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernd GronerGeorg Speyer Haus Institute for Biomedical Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. groner@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Axel Weber
Laura Mack
Georg Speyer Haus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two limiting aspects are mainly responsible for the sluggish development of new cancer drugs. They concern the chemical properties of potential drug molecules and the structural prerequisites for drug targets. The chemical properties which are being considered desirable for potential drugs are rather restrictive and mainly dictated by the rules of oral availability. Drug target structures are mostly defined as molecules which comprise binding pockets for low molecular weight compounds. These low molecular weight compounds then serve as leads for the derivation of analogs which recognize the same site and which can function as competitive or irreversibly binding inhibitors. The extension of the range of drug targets and the design of suitable lead compounds will be one of the most challenging tasks for drug developers in the future. Such auxiliary drug target structures can be found in the complex networks of interacting proteins which constitute the intracellular signal transduction cascades. The transient assembly of high molecular weight complexes, based on the specific interactions of particular domains, and usually regulated by secondary modifications, propagates extracellular signals through the cytoplasm and into the nucleus. Aberrations in the formation of protein complexes, or in the regulation of their disassembly, often trigger pathological conditions. The interference with interactions of proteins or the interactions of proteins with DNA offer new opportunities for drug discovery and development. Protein complexes which are indispensable for the growth and survival of cancer cells, proteins to which these cells are "addicted," appear most suited for such an approach. Stat3 and Survivin have been used as model proteins. Specific peptide ligands able to recognize and suppress the functions of crucial interaction surfaces of these proteins have been derived and shown to be able to induce cancer cell death. However, further technology development is required to turn such ligands into useful drugs. The technology comprises three steps: (1) the identification of a peptide ligand which specifically interacts with a crucial functional domain of a target protein, (2) the induction of a desired cellular phenotype upon intracellular interaction of the peptide ligand with its target structure and (3) the replacement of the peptide ligand with a functionally equivalent low molecular weight, drug like compound and its optimization through medicinal chemistry.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell Line, TumorDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryFerritinsHumansInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsLigandsNeoplasmsOncogene ProteinsOxidoreductasesPeptidesProtein BindingSignal TransductionSTAT3 Transcription FactorAntineoplastic AgentsBIRC5 protein, humanFerritinsFTH1 protein, humanInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsLigandsOncogene ProteinsOxidoreductasesPeptidesSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription FactorSurvivin

Identifiers

PMID22825353
PMCPMC3489706
OpenAlexW1998659741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.