Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22825331›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & therapy2012

The novel ATR inhibitor VE-821 increases sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to radiation and chemotherapy.

Remko Prevo, Emmanouil Fokas, Philip M Reaper, Peter A Charlton, John R Pollard, W Gillies McKenna, Ruth J Muschel, Thomas B Brunner

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 131 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 243 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Camonsertib, an ATRi, in Combination with Low-Dose Gemcitabine in Solid Tumors with DNA Damage Response Aberrations: Preclinical and Phase Ib Results.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Targeting the DNA damage response for cancer therapy.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Remko PrevoGray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Emmanouil Fokas
Philip M Reaper
Peter A Charlton
John R Pollard
W Gillies McKenna
Ruth J Muschel
Thomas B Brunner
CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology · GBVertex Pharmaceuticals (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11563Medical Research Council G0700730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damaging agents such as radiotherapy and gemcitabine are frequently used for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. However, these treatments typically provide only modest benefit. Improving the low survival rate for pancreatic cancer patients therefore remains a major challenge in oncology. Inhibition of the key DNA damage response kinase ATR has been suggested as an attractive approach for sensitization of tumor cells to DNA damaging agents, but specific ATR inhibitors have remained elusive. Here we investigated the sensitization potential of the first highly selective and potent ATR inhibitor, VE-821, in vitro. VE-821 inhibited radiation- and gemcitabine-induced phosphorylation of Chk1, confirming inhibition of ATR signaling. Consistently, VE-821 significantly enhanced the sensitivity of PSN-1, MiaPaCa-2 and primary PancM pancreatic cancer cells to radiation and gemcitabine under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. ATR inhibition by VE-821 led to inhibition of radiation-induced G 2/M arrest in cancer cells. Reduced cancer cell radiosurvival following treatment with VE-821 was also accompanied by increased DNA damage and inhibition of homologous recombination repair, as evidenced by persistence of γH2AX and 53BP1 foci and inhibition of Rad51 foci, respectively. These findings support ATR inhibition as a novel approach to improve the efficacy and therapeutic index of standard cancer treatments across a large proportion of pancreatic cancer patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsCell HypoxiaCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyDeoxycytidineDNA DamageDNA RepairGemcitabineHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesPyrazines3-amino-6-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-N-phenylpyrazine-2-carboxamideAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesPyrazinesRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsSulfones

Identifiers

PMID22825331
PMCPMC3461814
OpenAlexW2014588353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.