Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22824988›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2012

Systematic review and meta-analysis on heavy and lightweight polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.

M Śmietański, I A Śmietańska, A Modrzejewski, M P Simons, T J Aufenacker

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Uniformity of Chronic Pain Assessment after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Critical Review of the Literature.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Lightweight versus heavyweight synthetic mesh for inguinal hernia repair.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Mesh infection in cases of polypropylene mesh hernioplasty.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020
    Article
  10. Causes of recurrences after open inguinal herniorrhaphy.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Meta-analyses of lightweight versus conventional (heavy weight) mesh in inguinal hernia surgery.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M ŚmietańskiDepartment of General and Vascular Surgery, Ceynowa Hospital in Wejherowo, ul Jagalskiego 10, 84-200, Wejherowo, Poland. smietanski@herniaweb.org
I A Śmietańska
A Modrzejewski
M P Simons
T J Aufenacker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrence and pain are the two most important outcomes after inguinal hernia surgery. The concept of lightweight or partially absorbable macroporous meshes was developed under the assumption that the observed pain rate could be decreased without increasing the number of recurrences. Few randomized trials were published to analyze their clinical value, and some concern was raised because of an increased risk of recurrence. A systematic review and a meta-analysis of RCTs were carried out to determine whether the use of lightweight meshes influenced the pain and recurrence rate after Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

methodsTo assess the value of the lightweight mesh, an extensive literature search was performed. The random-effect meta-analysis model was used to correct for clinical diversity and methodological variations between studies. Recurrence rate, aspects of chronic pain and foreign body feeling at 6-60 months postoperatively were assessed.

resultsEight prospective RCTs of good quality were identified. Analysis demonstrated no significant difference regarding recurrence (OR, 1.11; 95 % CI, 0.57-2.14; p = 0.77). No significant difference was observed concerning severe pain (OR, 0.99; 95 % CI, 0.48-2.02; p = 0.97). Description of any pain resulted in a significant improvement in the lightweight group (OR, 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.50-0.84; p = 0.001). The presence of foreign body feeling was favoring the lightweight group (OR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.41-0.94; p = 0.02).

conclusionsThe use of lightweight mesh did not neither increase the recurrence rate nor reduce the incidence of severe pain. A significant reduction in foreign body feeling and overall pain rate in the postoperative period was recorded. Lightweight meshes could be considered as a material of choice in primary inguinal hernioplasty.

Indexed as

HerniorrhaphySurgical MeshChronic PainForeign BodiesHernia, InguinalHumansPolypropylenesPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceSensationPolypropylenes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.