Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22824531›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2012

Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Aslak Steinsbekk, Lisbeth Ø Rygg, Monde Lisulo, Marit B Rise, Atle Fretheim

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 255 papers, 23 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
255citing papers in PubMed, 23 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02002143 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Group Medical Visits (GMVs) in Primary Care: An RCT of Group-Based Versus Individual Appointments to Reduce HbA1c in Older People

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2014 to 2020Enrolled128ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)ArmsGroup Appointments, Individual Appointments (IAs)
NCT03453970 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Diabetes Education Program Based on Tailored Interventions in the Andalusian Public Health and Social System (Edep-Ti Study).

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalagaRan2018 to 2021Enrolled410ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsTherapeutic Education Program
NCT04313829 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Pharmacist Counseling on the Health-related Quality of Life of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitas PadjadjaranRan2017 to 2018Enrolled220ConditionsType 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsPharmacist Counseling Intervention
NCT05541120 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Remote Patient Monitoring and Patient Education on Patient Activation and Glycemic Control in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorTracy Jalbuena MDRan2022 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsRemote Patient Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

255 citing papers in PubMed, 23 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

195 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aslak SteinsbekkDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Post box 8905, Medisinsk teknisk forskningssenter, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. aslak.steinsbekk@ntnu.no
Lisbeth Ø Rygg
Monde Lisulo
Marit B Rise
Atle Fretheim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes self-management education (DSME) can be delivered in many forms. Group based DSME is widespread due to being a cheaper method and the added advantages of having patient meet and discuss with each other. assess effects of group-based DSME compared to routine treatment on clinical, lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes in type-2 diabetes patients.

methodsA systematic review with meta-analysis. Computerised bibliographic database were searched up to January 2008 for randomised controlled trials evaluating group-based DSME for adult type-2 diabetics versus routine treatment where the intervention had at least one session and =/>6 months follow-up. At least two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality.

resultsIn total 21 studies (26 publications, 2833 participants) were included. Of all the participants 4 out of 10 were male, baseline age was 60 years, BMI 31.6, HbA1c 8.23%, diabetes duration 8 years and 82% used medication. For the main clinical outcomes, HbA1c was significantly reduced at 6 months (0.44% points; P=0.0006, 13 studies, 1883 participants), 12 months (0.46% points; P=0.001, 11 studies, 1503 participants) and 2 years (0.87% points; P<0.00001, 3 studies, 397 participants) and fasting blood glucose levels were also significantly reduced at 12 months (1.26 mmol/l; P<0.00001, 5 studies, 690 participants) but not at 6 months. For the main lifestyle outcomes, diabetes knowledge was improved significantly at 6 months (SMD 0.83; P=0.00001, 6 studies, 768 participants), 12 months (SMD 0.85; P<0.00001, 5 studies, 955 participants) and 2 years (SMD 1.59; P=0.03, 2 studies, 355 participants) and self-management skills also improved significantly at 6 months (SMD 0.55; P=0.01, 4 studies, 534 participants). For the main psychosocial outcomes, there were significant improvement for empowerment/self-efficacy (SMD 0.28, P=0.01, 2 studies, 326 participants) after 6 months. For quality of life no conclusion could be drawn due to high heterogeneity. For the secondary outcomes there were significant improvements in patient satisfaction and body weight at 12 months for the intervention group. There were no differences between the groups in mortality rate, body mass index, blood pressure and lipid profile.

conclusionsGroup-based DSME in people with type 2 diabetes results in improvements in clinical, lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePower, PsychologicalQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID22824531
PMCPMC3418213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.