ReviewJournal of inorganic biochemistry2012
Ambidentate H-bonding of NO and O2 in heme proteins.
Review in Journal of inorganic biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conformational rigidity of cytochrome c'-α from a thermophile is associated with slow NO binding.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- P450 CYP17A1 Variant with a Disordered Proton Shuttle Assembly Retains Peroxo-Mediated Lyase Efficiency.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020Article
- Alternative modes of OJournal of inorganic biochemistry · 2020Article
- Active Site Structures of CYP11A1 in the Presence of Its Physiological Substrates and Alterations upon Binding of Adrenodoxin.Biochemistry · 2017Article
- Unveiling the crucial intermediates in androgen production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Electronic structure and ligand vibrations in FeNO, CoNO, and FeOO porphyrin adducts.Inorganic chemistry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The affinity and reactivity of the gaseous molecules CO, NO and O(2) (XO) in heme protein adducts are controlled by secondary interactions, especially by H-bonds donated from distal protein residues. Vibrational spectroscopy, supported by DFT (Density Functional Theory) modeling, has revealed that for NO and O(2), but not for CO, a critical issue is whether the H-bond is donated to the outer or inner atom of the bound diatomic ligand. DFT modeling shows that bound NO and O(2) are ambidentate, both atoms separately acting as H-bond acceptors. This is not the case for CO, whose π* orbital acts as a delocalized H-bond acceptor. Vibrational spectra of heme-XO adducts reveal a general pattern of backbonding variations, marked by families of negative correlations between frequencies associated with FeX and XO bond stretches. For heme-CO adducts, H-bonding increases backbonding, the νFeX/νXO points moving up the backbonding correlation established with model compounds. For NO and O(2) adducts, however, increased backbonding is only observed when the outer atom is the H-bond acceptor. H-bonding to the inner (X) atom instead produces a positive νFeX/νXO correlation. This effect can be reproduced by DFT modeling. Its mechanism is polarization of the sp(2) orbital on the X atom, on the back side of the bent FeXO unit, drawing electrons from both the FeX and XO bonds and weakening them together. Thus, the positioning of H-bond donors in the protein differentially affects bonding and reactivity in heme adducts of NO and O(2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.