Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22823101›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2014

Reduced ethanol consumption and preference in cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) knockout mice.

Armando G Salinas, Chinh T Q Nguyen, Dara Ahmadi-Tehrani, Richard A Morrisett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. CART Peptides and Drugs of Abuse: A Review of Recent Progress.Journal of drug and alcohol research · 2016
    Article
  11. Genes and Alcohol Consumption: Studies with Mutant Mice.International review of neurobiology · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Armando G SalinasDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Chinh T Q Nguyen
Dara Ahmadi-Tehrani
Richard A Morrisett
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Target Validation byAccumbal Plasticity ScreeningU01AA016651 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Regina A. Mangieri · 2006 to 2026
$3.8M
Ethanol, Dependence and Mesolimbic PlasticityR01AA015167 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI MANGIERI, REGINA A. · 2005 to 2015
$2.3M
Central Amygdala CART modulates ethanol withdrawal induced anxietyF31AA017834 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SALINAS, ARMANDO · 2008 to 2011
$92k
ETHANOL EXPOSURE AND HIPPOCAMPAL ELECTROGRAPHIC SEIZURESR29AA009230 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI MORRISETT, RICHARD A · 1992 to 1996
–
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA017834NIAAA NIH HHS F31AA017834NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015167NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA15167NIAAA NIH HHS R29 AA009230NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA016651NIAAA NIH HHS U01AA16651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) is a neuropeptide implicated in addiction to drugs of abuse. Several studies have characterized the role of CART in addiction to psychostimulants, but few have examined the role of CART in alcohol use disorders including alcoholism. The current study utilized a CART knockout (KO) mouse model to investigate the role of CART in ethanol appetitive behaviors. A two-bottle choice, unlimited-access paradigm was used to compare ethanol appetitive behaviors between CART wild type (WT) and KO mice. The mice were presented with an ethanol solution (3%-21%) and water, each concentration for 4 days, and their consumption was measured daily. Consumption of quinine (bitter) and saccharin (sweet) solutions was measured following the ethanol preference tests. In addition, ethanol metabolism rates and ethanol sensitivity were compared between genotypes. CART KO mice consumed and preferred ethanol less than their WT counterparts in both sexes. This genotype effect could not be attributed to differences in bitter or sweet taste perception or ethanol metabolism rates. There was also no difference in ethanol sensitivity in male mice; however, CART KO female mice showed a greater ethanol sensitivity than the WT females. Taken together, these data demonstrate a role for CART in ethanol appetitive behaviors and as a possible therapeutic drug target for alcoholism and abstinence enhancement.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAlcohol DrinkingAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnimalsAppetitive BehaviorBrainChoice BehaviorCocaine- and Amphetamine-Regulated Transcript ProteinDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrinking WaterEthanolFemaleFood PreferencesGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticCocaine- and Amphetamine-Regulated Transcript ProteinDrinking WaterEthanolNerve Tissue ProteinsQuinineSaccharinSweetening AgentsAddictionalcoholismCARTethanolknockoutmouse

Identifiers

PMID22823101
PMCPMC4148419
OpenAlexW1909362366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.