Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22823069›Full record

Trial reportHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2013

Randomized controlled trial testing an internet physical activity intervention for sedentary adults.

Lucas J Carr, Shira I Dunsiger, Beth Lewis, Joseph T Ciccolo, Sheri Hartman, Beth Bock, Gregory Dominick, Bess H Marcus

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Face-to-face interventions for promoting physical activity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. A mixed-methods randomized controlled trial of financial incentives and peer networks to promote walking among older adults.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2014
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucas J CarrDepartment of Kinesiology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA. carrl@ecu.edu
Shira I Dunsiger
Beth Lewis
Joseph T Ciccolo
Sheri Hartman
Beth Bock
Gregory Dominick
Bess H Marcus

Funding

Internet Technologies to Increase Exercise BehaviorR01HL069866 · NHLBI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI MARCUS, BESS HYA · 2003 to 2006
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL069866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInternet-based physical activity (PA) interventions have shown promise, although findings remain equivocal. We used formative research to enhance a previously demonstrated program (Step into Motion) with the goal of developing an Internet program poised for dissemination.

methodsWe conducted focus groups to identify Internet features targeted to theoretical constructs (social cognitive theory) predictive of PA behavior and rated as "useful for increasing PA." We identified 5 theory-targeted Internet features as useful for increasing PA: (1) a PA tracking/logging calendar targeting self-monitoring and goal setting; (2) geographic mapping tools targeting perceived environment; (3) a discussion forum targeting social support; (4) exercise videos targeting observational learning; and (5) regular updates of peer PA progress targeting situation. We then tested the efficacy of the enhanced program (enhanced Internet, EI; N = 25) in relation to publicly available PA Websites (standard Internet, SI; N = 28) among 53 participants in a randomized controlled trial.

resultsThe EI arm increased PA in relation to the SI arm at 3 months (18.4 to 186.0 min/wk vs. 20.9 to 57.3 min/wk; p = .03) but between-groups differences were not observed at 6 months (176.8 vs. 133.5 min/wk; p = .44). EI participants maintained PA from 3 to 6 months (186.0 to 176.8 min/wk), and the SI group increased PA (57.3 to 133.5 min/wk).

conclusionThe EI program was efficacious at improving PA levels in relation to publicly available Websites initially, but differences in PA levels were not maintained at 6 months. Future research should identify Internet features that promote long-term maintenance.

Indexed as

InternetMotor ActivitySedentary BehaviorAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationPsychological Theory

Identifiers

PMID22823069
PMCPMC5718348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.