ArticleExpert opinion on drug discovery2010
Development of drugs for Epstein-Barr virus using high-throughput in silico virtual screening.
Article in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Momordica anti-HIV protein MAP30 abrogates the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 dependent functions in host cells.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Report of the 24th Meeting on Signal Transduction 2021.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Targeting Host Cellular Factors as a Strategy of Therapeutic Intervention for Herpesvirus Infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importance of the fieldEpstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous human herpesvirus that is causally associated with endemic forms of Burkitt's lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoproliferative disease in immunosuppressed individuals. On a global scale, EBV infects > 90% of the adult population and is responsible for ∼ 1% of all human cancers. To date, there is no efficacious drug or therapy for the treatment of EBV infection and EBV-related diseases. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: In this review, we discuss the existing anti-EBV inhibitors and those under development. We discuss the value of different molecular targets, including EBV lytic DNA replication enzymes as well as proteins that are expressed exclusively during latent infection, such as EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) and latent membrane protein 1. As the atomic structure of the EBNA-1 DNA binding domain has been described, it is an attractive target for in silico methods of drug design and small molecule screening. We discuss the use of computational methods that can greatly facilitate the development of novel inhibitors and how in silico screening methods can be applied to target proteins with known structures, such as EBNA-1, to treat EBV infection and disease. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The reader is familiarized with the problems in targeting of EBV for inhibition by small molecules and how computational methods can greatly facilitate this process. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Despite the impressive efficacy of nucleoside analogs for the treatment of herpesvirus lytic infection, there remain few effective treatments for latent infections. As EBV latent infection persists within and contributes to the formation of EBV-associated cancers, targeting EBV latent proteins is an unmet medical need. High-throughput in silico screening can accelerate the process of drug discovery for novel and selective agents that inhibit EBV latent infection and associated disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.