Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22822398›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2012

Molecular Chaperones as Targets to Circumvent the CFTR Defect in Cystic Fibrosis.

Rebecca A Chanoux, Ronald C Rubenstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Functional Consequences of CFTR Interactions in Cystic Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. KDM2A and KDM3B as Potential Targets for the Rescue of F508del-CFTR.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Plant Extracts and Phytochemicals TargetingFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca A ChanouxDivision of Pulmonary Medicine and Cystic Fibrosis Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ronald C Rubenstein
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

DELTAF508-CFTR TRAFFICKING REGULATED BY 4-PHENYLBUTYRATER01DK058046 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI RUBENSTEIN, RONALD C · 2000 to 2012
$3.5M
GENE THERAPY TRAINING--CYSTIC FIBROSIS/GENETIC DISEASEST32DK007748 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WOLFE, JOHN H · 1997 to 2011
$2.8M
Regulatory Interactions of CFTR and ENaCR01DK073185 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI RUBENSTEIN, RONALD C · 2009 to 2010
$823k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058046NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK073185NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is the most common autosomal recessive lethal disorder among Caucasian populations. CF results from mutations and resulting dysfunction of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR). CFTR is a cyclic AMP-dependent chloride channel that is localized to the apical membrane in epithelial cells where it plays a key role in salt and water homeostasis. An intricate network of molecular chaperone proteins regulates CFTR's proper maturation and trafficking to the apical membrane. Understanding and manipulation of this network may lead to therapeutics for CF in cases where mutant CFTR has aberrant trafficking.

Indexed as

CFTRchaperoneendoplasmic reticulumERADheat shock proteinphenylbutyrate

Identifiers

PMID22822398
PMCPMC3398409
OpenAlexW2115122171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.