ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2012
Characteristics of distribution of morphine and metabolites in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma with chronic intrathecal morphine infusion in humans.
Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Anterior Cisterna and High Cervical Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Craniofacial Cancer Pain: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Rebuttal Letter to the Editor: Defending Evidence-Based Practices in Interventional Pain Medicine [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Effects of buoyancy on the dispersion of drugs released intrathecally in the spinal canal.Journal of fluid mechanics · 2024Article
- A perspective: neuraxial therapeutics in pain management: now and future.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Advances and Applications in the Management of Chronic Pain Patient.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Therapy via a Percutaneous Port for Refractory Cancer Pain in China: An Efficacy, Safety and Cost Utilization Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2020Article
- Long-term morphine delivery via slow release morphine pellets or osmotic pumps: Plasma concentration, analgesia, and naloxone-precipitated withdrawal.Life sciences · 2017Article
- Current and Future Issues in the Development of Spinal Agents for the Management of Pain.Current neuropharmacology · 2017Review
- The Pharmacology of Spinal Opioids and Ziconotide for the Treatment of Non-Cancer Pain.Current neuropharmacology · 2017Review
- Role of Catheter's Position for Final Results in Intrathecal Drug Delivery. Analysis Based on CSF Dynamics and Specific Drugs Profiles.The Korean journal of pain · 2013Review
- Comparison of different local analgesia protocols in postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite widespread use of chronic intrathecal (IT) infusions of morphine, there is little systematic human work evaluating the steady state morphine concentrations or cerebrospinal (CSF) chemistry after long-term IT morphine delivery. We sought to address these issues in patients receiving chronic IT morphine infusion.
methodsPain patients with implanted catheters and pumps (range: 127 to 2165 days), receiving a stable dosing (>1 week) of IT morphine by infusion, were entered into the study. The following sequence was performed: (1) estimation of pain score; (2) radiograph localization of catheter tip; (3) percutaneous sampling of lumbar CSF at the L4 to 5 or L5-S1 space. CSF/plasma samples were assayed for chemistry, and morphine and its 3/6 glucuronide metabolites (M3G, M6G) by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
resultsNineteen patients were enrolled. CSF samples were obtained from 16 subjects. Three patients were not included in the primary analysis because 1 catheter was epidural, 1 catheter was fractured, and 1 had a granuloma at the catheter tip. Of the 13 sampled patients, the range of daily doses, rates, and concentrations were 1.6 to 25 mg/d and 0.1 to 1 mL/d, 5 to 50 mg/mL, respectively. The principal observations were as follows: (i) morphine, M3G, and M6G were present in the CSF and plasma and showed a significant regression slope when plotted versus daily dose; (ii) in contrast, the regression slope of the group ratio morphine:M3G:M6G plotted versus daily dose in CSF or plasma was not different from zero; (iii) plotting "normalized" CSF analyte concentration (e.g., concentration at site/daily IT morphine dose) against the segmental distance of the sampling site from the catheter tip revealed a significant decline in concentration of morphine, but not of conjugates as a function of distance from the catheter tip; (iv) plotting CSF protein, glucose, and red and white cell counts versus daily morphine dose or morphine concentration at the sampling site revealed no significant regression; and (v) patients with a catheter failure or a granuloma showed reduced concentrations of morphine in their CSF.
conclusionChronic infusion of morphine shows high concentrations, which correlate with the infusion dose and the proximity of the sampling site to the infusion site with no effects on CSF chemistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.