Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22821858›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2013

High-resolution functional MRI at 3 T: 3D/2D echo-planar imaging with optimized physiological noise correction.

Antoine Lutti, David L Thomas, Chloe Hutton, Nikolaus Weiskopf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Uncoupling Sensation and Perception in Human Time Processing.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antoine LuttiWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. a.lutti@ucl.ac.uk
David L Thomas
Chloe Hutton
Nikolaus Weiskopf

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901275Wellcome Trust 079866/Z/06/ZWellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution functional MRI (fMRI) offers unique possibilities for studying human functional neuroanatomy. Although high-resolution fMRI has proven its potential at 7 T, most fMRI studies are still performed at rather low spatial resolution at 3 T. We optimized and compared single-shot two-dimensional echo-planar imaging (EPI) and multishot three-dimensional EPI high-resolution fMRI protocols. We extended image-based physiological noise correction from two-dimensional EPI to multishot three-dimensional EPI. The functional sensitivity of both acquisition schemes was assessed in a visual fMRI experiment. The physiological noise correction increased the sensitivity significantly, can be easily applied, and requires simple recordings of pulse and respiration only. The combination of three-dimensional EPI with physiological noise correction provides exceptional sensitivity for 1.5 mm high-resolution fMRI at 3 T, increasing the temporal signal-to-noise ratio by more than 25% compared to two-dimensional EPI.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAdultAlgorithmsBrainBrain MappingEcho-Planar ImagingHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID22821858
PMCPMC4495253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.