Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22821762›Full record

ArticleProteins2012

Predicting Ca2+ -binding sites using refined carbon clusters.

Kun Zhao, Xue Wang, Hing C Wong, Robert Wohlhueter, Michael P Kirberger, Guantao Chen, Jenny J Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CaProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural Aspects and Prediction of Calmodulin-Binding Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Design of Calcium-Binding Proteins to Sense Calcium.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kun ZhaoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Xue Wang
Hing C Wong
Robert Wohlhueter
Michael P Kirberger
Guantao Chen
Jenny J Yang

Funding

Designing Magnetic Resonance Protein-based Contrast Agents with High RelaxivityR01EB007268 · NIBIB · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, JENNY J. · 2007 to 2015
$3.1M
Structural Biology of receptor-mediated extracellular calcium signalingR01GM081749 · NIGMS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, JENNY J. · 2007 to 2011
$1.2M
Rational Design and Analysis of Calcium Binding ProteinR01GM062999 · NIGMS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, JENNY J · 2001 to 2005
$991k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007268NIGMS NIH HHS GM081749NIGMS NIH HHS GM62999NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062999NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying Ca(2+) -binding sites in proteins is the first step toward understanding the molecular basis of diseases related to Ca(2+) -binding proteins. Currently, these sites are identified in structures either through X-ray crystallography or NMR analysis. However, Ca(2+) -binding sites are not always visible in X-ray structures due to flexibility in the binding region or low occupancy in a Ca(2+) -binding site. Similarly, both Ca(2+) and its ligand oxygens are not directly observed in NMR structures. To improve our ability to predict Ca(2+) -binding sites in both X-ray and NMR structures, we report a new graph theory algorithm (MUG(C) ) to predict Ca(2+) -binding sites. Using carbon atoms covalently bonded to the chelating oxygen atoms, and without explicit reference to side-chain oxygen ligand co-ordinates, MUG(C) is able to achieve 94% sensitivity with 76% selectivity on a dataset of X-ray structures composed of 43 Ca(2+) -binding proteins. Additionally, prediction of Ca(2+) -binding sites in NMR structures was obtained by MUG(C) using a different set of parameters, which were determined by the analysis of both Ca(2+) -constrained and unconstrained Ca(2+) -loaded structures derived from NMR data. MUG(C) identified 20 of 21 Ca(2+) -binding sites in NMR structures inferred without the use of Ca(2+) constraints. MUG(C) predictions are also highly selective for Ca(2+) -binding sites as analyses of binding sites for Mg(2+) , Zn(2+) , and Pb(2+) were not identified as Ca(2+) -binding sites. These results indicate that the geometric arrangement of the second-shell carbon cluster is sufficient not only for accurate identification of Ca(2+) -binding sites in NMR and X-ray structures but also for selective differentiation between Ca(2+) and other relevant divalent cations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBinding SitesCalciumCalcium-Binding ProteinsCalmodulinCarbonCattleCell Cycle ProteinsComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularCalciumCalcium-Binding ProteinsCalmodulinCarbonCell Cycle ProteinsCETN2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22821762
PMCPMC3486949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.