ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2012
Applicability of adult techniques for ovarian preservation to childhood cancer patients.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2013Guideline
- International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology (IPSO) Surgical Practice Guidelines.Ecancermedicalscience · 2022Article
- Ovarian Transposition in a Young Girl with Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of Bladder.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2018Article
- Effects of vitrification on the viability of alginate encapsulated isolated bovine pre-antral follicles.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018Article
- Fertility Preservation for Prepubertal Girls: Update and Current Challenges.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2013Article
- Legal termination of a pregnancy resulting from transplanted cryopreserved ovarian tissue due to cancer recurrence.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2013Article
- Optimizing cryoprotectant perfusion conditions for intact ovary: a bovine model.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo appraise the feasibility of current adult medical and surgical techniques for ovarian preservation in pre-pubertal and adolescent girls with cancer.
methodsLiterature search using PubMed and SCOPUS up to February 2012. In addition, the reference lists of selected studies and all identified systematic and narrative reviews were scanned for relevant references. Inclusion criteria were ovarian preservation and cancer. Exclusion criteria were non-English publications, letters, personal communications, and ovarian preservation for conditions other than cancer.
resultsData from the selected publications was interpreted and discussed in the relevant sections. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue followed by autologous transplant represents the only surgical option available for pre-pubertal girls and adolescents who cannot delay the start of chemotherapy. Few studies report on pre-pubertal and adolescent girls undergoing ovarian preservation surgeries with good harvesting, and no follow-up has been conveyed, to date. Outcomes of ovarian function after ovarian suppression with GnRH-analogs in adults have been controversial and no reports are available for pre-pubertal girls.
conclusionsAutologous transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian cortex probably represents the best option for preservation of fertility and hormonal function in childhood cancer females; however, future research needs to address the safety of this technique, especially in patients with blood-borne cancers. Ovarian suppression with GnRH-analogs at the time of chemotherapy treatment has not proven to be superior to non-suppression for fertility preservation purposes in adults. Not enough evidence is presently available in childhood cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.