Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22821395›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2013

Accuracy and speed of robotic assisted needle interventions using a modern cone beam computed tomography intervention suite: a phantom study.

Boris Schulz, Katrin Eichler, Petra Siebenhandl, Tatjana Gruber-Rouh, Christoph Czerny, Thomas Josef Vogl, Stephan Zangos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Robotic navigation-assisted percutaneous liver puncture: a pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. CRANE: A Redundant, Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Computed Tomography Robot for Heightened Needle Dexterity within a Medical Imaging Bore.IEEE transactions on robotics : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Current State of Robotics in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AngleNav: MEMS Tracker to Facilitate CT-Guided Puncture.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Performance of Robotic Assistance for Skull Base Biopsy: A Phantom Study.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Boris SchulzInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. boris.schell@googlemail.com
Katrin Eichler
Petra Siebenhandl
Tatjana Gruber-Rouh
Christoph Czerny
Thomas Josef Vogl
Stephan Zangos
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse the feasibility and accuracy of robotic aided interventions on a phantom when using a modern C-arm-mounted cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device in combination with needle guidance software.

methodsA small robotic device capable of holding and guiding needles was attached to the intervention table. After acquiring a 3D data set the access path was planned on the CBCT workstation and shown on the intervention monitor. Then the robot was aligned to the live fluorosopic image. A total of 40 punctures were randomly conducted on a phantom armed with several targets (diameter 2 mm) in single and double oblique trajectory (n = 20 each). Target distance, needle deviation and time for the procedures were analysed.

resultsAll phantom interventions (n = 40) could be performed successfully. Mean target access path within the phantom was 8.5 cm (min 4.2 cm, max 13.5 cm). Average needle tip deviation was 1.1 mm (min 0 mm, max 4.5 mm), time duration was 3:59 min (min 2:07 min, max 10:37 min).

conclusionWhen using the proposed robot device in a CBCT intervention suite, highly accurate needle-based interventional punctures are possible in a reasonable timely manner in single as well as in double oblique trajectories.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyPhantoms, ImagingRoboticsBiopsy, NeedleEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPuncturesRadiography, InterventionalSoftwareStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID22821395
OpenAlexW1989008518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.