ReviewFEBS letters2012
Generating pluripotent stem cells: differential epigenetic changes during cellular reprogramming.
Review in FEBS letters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Advanced Animal Replacement Testing Strategies Using Stem Cell and Organoids.International journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- Research progress in stem cell therapy for Wilson disease.Regenerative therapy · 2024Review
- Epigenetic regulation and factors that influence the effect of iPSCs-derived neural stem/progenitor cells (NS/PCs) in the treatment of spinal cord injury.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Review
- Exploring the promising potential of induced pluripotent stem cells in cancer research and therapy.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- Drosophila SERTAD domain protein Taranis is required in somatic cells for maintenance of male germline stem cells.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021Article
- The Potential of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Treat and Model Alzheimer's Disease.Stem cells international · 2021Review
- Pluripotent stem cell-based therapy for Parkinson's disease: Current status and future prospects.Progress in neurobiology · 2018Review
- Current status in cancer cell reprogramming and its clinical implications.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017Review
- The Olfactory Neural Epithelium As a Tool in Neuroscience.Trends in molecular medicine · 2017Article
- The mitochondrial protein CHCHD2 primes the differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells to neuroectodermal lineages.The Journal of cell biology · 2016Article
- Epigenetic regulation of stemness maintenance in the neurogenic niches.World journal of stem cells · 2015Review
- Methylation and transcripts expression at the imprinted GNAS locus in human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives.Stem cell reports · 2014Article
- Concise review: drug discovery in the age of the induced pluripotent stem cell.Stem cells translational medicine · 2014Review
- The future of neuroepigenetics in the human brain.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2014Review
- A simple and scalable process for the differentiation of retinal pigment epithelium from human pluripotent stem cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2013Article
- Concise review: the relevance of human stem cell-derived organoid models for epithelial translational medicine.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2013Review
- Long-term effects of chromatin remodeling and DNA damage in stem cells induced by environmental and dietary agents.Journal of environmental pathology, toxicology and oncology : official organ of the International Society for Environmental Toxicology and Cancer · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pluripotent stem cells hold enomous potential for therapuetic applications in tissue replacement therapy. Reprogramming somatic cells from a patient donor to generate pluripotent stem cells involves both ethical concerns inherent in the use of embryonic and oocyte-derived stem cells, as well as issues of histocompatibility. Among the various pluripotent stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)--derived by ectopic expression of four reprogramming factors in donor somatic cells--are superior in terms of ethical use, histocompatibility, and derivation method. However, iPSC also show genetic and epigenetic differences that limit their differentiation potential, functionality, safety, and potential clinical utility. Here, we discuss the unique characteristics of iPSC and approaches that are being taken to overcome these limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.