Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22819106›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2012

Fragility of brushite stones in shock wave lithotripsy: absence of correlation with computerized tomography visible structure.

James C Williams, Tariq Hameed, Molly E Jackson, Syed Aftab, Alessia Gambaro, Yuri A Pishchalnikov, James E Lingeman, James A McAteer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James C WilliamsDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5120, USA. jwillia3@iupui.edu
Tariq Hameed
Molly E Jackson
Syed Aftab
Alessia Gambaro
Yuri A Pishchalnikov
James E Lingeman
James A McAteer
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

SWL AND RENAL INJURY AND STONE COMMINUTIONP01DK043881 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WILLIAMS, JAMES C · 1994 to 2023
$33.5M
The Structural Basis of Kidney Stone FragilityR01DK059933 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI WILLIAMS, JAMES C · 2004 to 2011
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK043881NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK059933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrushite stones were imaged in vitro and then broken with shock wave lithotripsy to assess whether stone fragility correlates with internal stone structure visible on helical computerized tomography. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 52 brushite calculi were scanned by micro computerized tomography, weighed, hydrated and placed in a radiological phantom. Stones were scanned using a Philips® Brilliance iCT 256 system and images were evaluated for the visibility of internal structural features. The calculi were then treated with shock wave lithotripsy in vitro. The number of shock waves needed to break each stone to completion was recorded.

resultsThe number of shock waves needed to break each stone normalized to stone weight did not differ by HU value (p = 0.84) or by computerized tomography visible structures that could be identified consistently by all observers (p = 0.053). Stone fragility correlated highly with stone density and brushite content (each p <0.001). Calculi of almost pure brushite required the most shock waves to break. When all observations of computerized tomography visible structures were used for analysis by logistic fit, computerized tomography visible structure predicted increased stone fragility with an overall area under the ROC curve of 0.64.

conclusionsThe shock wave lithotripsy fragility of brushite stones did not correlate with internal structure discernible on helical computerized tomography. However, fragility did correlate with stone density and increasing brushite mineral content, consistent with clinical experience with patients with brushite calculi. Thus, current diagnostic computerized tomography technology does not provide a means to predict when brushite stones will break well using shock wave lithotripsy.

Indexed as

Calcium PhosphatesLithotripsyTomography, Spiral ComputedIn Vitro TechniquesKidney Calculicalcium phosphate, dibasic, dihydrateCalcium Phosphates

Identifiers

PMID22819106
PMCPMC3418465
OpenAlexW2150156397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.