Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22818913›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2012

Genetic consequences of programmed genome rearrangement.

Jeramiah J Smith, Carl Baker, Evan E Eichler, Chris T Amemiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mendelian nightmares: the germline-restricted chromosome of songbirds.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Delete and survive: strategies of programmed genetic material elimination in eukaryotes.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Programmed DNA Elimination in Vertebrates.Annual review of animal biosciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeramiah J SmithBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. jjsmit3@uky.edu
Carl Baker
Evan E Eichler
Chris T Amemiya

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN GENOMIC SCIENCEST32HG000035 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Bruce Colston Trapnell · 1995 to 2026
$24.2M
Genomics Resources and Infrastucture for the ZebrafishR24RR014085 · NCRR · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI AMEMIYA, CHRIS T. · 2000 to 2011
$3.3M
MECHANISM &INSTABILITY OF PERICENTROMERIC DUPLICATIONSR01GM058815 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EICHLER, EVAN · 1999 to 2010
$2.9M
Emergence of developmental and genomic complexity in a basal vertebrateR01GM090049 · NIGMS · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI AMEMIYA, CHRIS T., BRONNER, MARIANNE · 2010 to 2013
$2.2M
Germline sequence resources & analyses in a vertebrate model that undergoes PGRR24GM095471 · NIGMS · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI AMEMIYA, CHRIS T. · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
Developmental and genomic studies on the agnatha VLR systemR21GM079492 · NIGMS · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI AMEMIYA, CHRIS T. · 2007 to 2008
$503k
Novel insight into stability and change in a basal vetebrate genomeF32GM087919 · NIGMS · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI SMITH, JERAMIAH JAMES · 2009 to 2010
$65k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCRR NIH HHS R24 RR014085NCRR NIH HHS RR014085NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000035NHGRI NIH HHS T32-HG00035NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM087919NIGMS NIH HHS F32-GM087919NIGMS NIH HHS GM079492NIGMS NIH HHS GM090049NIGMS NIH HHS GM58815NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058815NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090049NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM079492NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM095471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) undergoes developmentally programmed genome rearrangements that mediate deletion of∼20% of germline DNA from somatic cells during early embryogenesis. This genomic differentiation of germline and soma is intriguing, because the germline plays a unique biological role wherein it must possess the ability to undergo meiotic recombination and the capacity to differentiate into every cell type. These evolutionarily indispensable functions set the germline at odds with somatic tissues, because factors that promote recombination and pluripotency can potentially disrupt genome integrity or specification of cell fate when misexpressed in somatic cell lineages (e.g., in oncogenesis). Here, we describe the development of new genomic and transcriptomic resources for lamprey and use these to identify hundreds of genes that are targeted for programmed deletion from somatic cell lineages. Transcriptome sequencing and targeted validation studies further confirm that somatically deleted genes function both in adult (meiotic) germline and in the development of primordial germ cells during embryogenesis. Inferred functional information from deleted regions indicates that developmentally programmed rearrangement serves as a (perhaps ancient) biological strategy to ensure segregation of pluripotency functions to the germline, effectively eliminating the potential for somatic misexpression.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionGene RearrangementGenomeAnimalsFemaleGerm CellsLampreysMaleSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID22818913
PMCPMC3427415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.