Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22818493›Full record

Trial reportTrials2012

The cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

David M Tappin, Linda Bauld, Carol Tannahill, Linda de Caestecker, Andrew Radley, Alex McConnachie, Kathleen Boyd, Andrew Briggs, Liz Grant, Alan Cameron and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Competitions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

David M TappinPaediatric Epidemiology and Community Health Unit, Section of Child Health, Division of Developmental Medicine, Glasgow University, Yorkhill Campus, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. david.tappin@glasgow.ac.uk
Linda Bauld
Carol Tannahill
Linda de Caestecker
Andrew Radley
Alex McConnachie
Kathleen Boyd
Andrew Briggs
Liz Grant
Alan Cameron
Susan Macaskill
Lesley Sinclair
Brenda Friel
Tim Coleman
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBGartnavel General Hospital · GBGlasgow Centre for Population Health · GBGlasgow Life · GBKing's Cross Hospital · GBThe Robertson Trust · GBUK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeventy percent of women in Scotland have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help most young women quit smoking before their own health is irreparably compromised. By quitting during pregnancy their infants will be protected from miscarriage and still birth as well as low birth weight, asthma, attention deficit disorder and adult cardiovascular disease. In the UK, the NICE guidelines: 'How to stop smoking in pregnancy and following childbirth' (June 2010) highlighted that little evidence exists in the literature to confirm the efficacy of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers to quit. Its first research recommendation was to determine: Within a UK context, are incentives an acceptable, effective and cost-effective way to help pregnant women who smoke to quit? DESIGN AND

methodsThis study is a phase II exploratory individually randomized controlled trial comparing standard care for pregnant smokers with standard care plus the additional offer of financial voucher incentives to engage with specialist cessation services and/or to quit smoking during pregnancy.Participants (n = 600) will be pregnant smokers identified at maternity booking who, when contacted by specialist cessation services, agree to having their details passed to the NHS Smokefree Pregnancy Study Helpline to discuss the trial. The NHS Smokefree Pregnancy Study Helpline will be responsible for telephone consent and follow-up in late pregnancy. The primary outcome will be self reported smoking in late pregnancy verified by cotinine measurement. An economic evaluation will refine cost data collection and assess potential cost-effectiveness while qualitative research interviews with clients and health professionals will assess the level of acceptance of this form of incentive payment. The research questions are: What is the likely therapeutic efficacy? Are incentives potentially cost-effective? Is individual randomization an efficient trial design without introducing outcome bias? Can incentives be introduced in a way that is feasible and acceptable? DISCUSSION: This phase II trial will establish a workable design to reduce the risks associated with a future definitive phase III multicenter randomized controlled trial and establish a framework to assess the costs and benefits of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers to quit.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN87508788.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsSmoking CessationAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsQualitative ResearchResearch DesignScotland

Identifiers

PMID22818493
PMCPMC3482147
OpenAlexW2140053468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.