ArticlePloS one2012
An infinitesimal model for quantitative trait genomic value prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reversible jumps for the joint modeling of the dimension of pseudo-functional models in chromosomal windows in genome-wide selection.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Perspectives on current and future yeast technologies for ethanol-based biofuels and bioproducts.FEMS yeast research · 2025Review
- Scrutinizing neurodegenerative diseases: decoding the complex genetic architectures through a multi-omics lens.Human genomics · 2024Review
- Singular effect of linkage on long-term genetic gain in Fisher's infinitesimal model.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Genetic influences on the interactionist model of socioeconomic development: Incorporating polygenic scores for educational attainment into developmental research using the Family Transitions Project (FTP).Developmental psychology · 2021Article
- Multivariate genome-wide association study of leaf shape in a Populus deltoides and P. simonii F1 pedigree.PloS one · 2021Article
- High-Quality SNP Linkage Maps Improved QTL Mapping and Genome Assembly in Populus.The Journal of heredity · 2020Article
- Genome-wide association studies using binned genotypes.Heredity · 2020Article
- A Comparison of Co-expression Networks in Silk Gland Reveals the Causes of Silk Yield Increase During Silkworm Domestication.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Functional models in genome-wide selection.PloS one · 2019Article
- Expanding the BLUP alphabet for genomic prediction adaptable to the genetic architectures of complex traits.Heredity · 2018Article
- Exome-wide rare variant analyses of two bone mineral density phenotypes: the challenges of analyzing rare genetic variation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- High Density Linkage Map Construction and Mapping of Yield Trait QTLs in Maize (Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Genome-wide association studies using haplotypes and individual SNPs in Simmental cattle.PloS one · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed a marker based infinitesimal model for quantitative trait analysis. In contrast to the classical infinitesimal model, we now have new information about the segregation of every individual locus of the entire genome. Under this new model, we propose that the genetic effect of an individual locus is a function of the genome location (a continuous quantity). The overall genetic value of an individual is the weighted integral of the genetic effect function along the genome. Numerical integration is performed to find the integral, which requires partitioning the entire genome into a finite number of bins. Each bin may contain many markers. The integral is approximated by the weighted sum of all the bin effects. We now turn the problem of marker analysis into bin analysis so that the model dimension has decreased from a virtual infinity to a finite number of bins. This new approach can efficiently handle virtually unlimited number of markers without marker selection. The marker based infinitesimal model requires high linkage disequilibrium of all markers within a bin. For populations with low or no linkage disequilibrium, we develop an adaptive infinitesimal model. Both the original and the adaptive models are tested using simulated data as well as beef cattle data. The simulated data analysis shows that there is always an optimal number of bins at which the predictability of the bin model is much greater than the original marker analysis. Result of the beef cattle data analysis indicates that the bin model can increase the predictability from 10% (multiple marker analysis) to 33% (multiple bin analysis). The marker based infinitesimal model paves a way towards the solution of genetic mapping and genomic selection using the whole genome sequence data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.