Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22815861›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Distinct genes related to drug response identified in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer cell lines.

Kui Shen, Shara D Rice, David A Gingrich, Dakun Wang, Zhibao Mi, Chunqiao Tian, Zhenyu Ding, Stacey L Brower, Paul R Ervin, Michael J Gabrin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Does estrogen receptor determination affect prognosis in early stage breast cancers?International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  14. Antitumor mechanisms of S-allyl mercaptocysteine for breast cancer therapy.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kui ShenPrecision Therapeutics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Shara D Rice
David A Gingrich
Dakun Wang
Zhibao Mi
Chunqiao Tian
Zhenyu Ding
Stacey L Brower
Paul R Ervin
Michael J Gabrin
George Tseng
Nan Song

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer patients have different responses to chemotherapeutic treatments. Genes associated with drug response can provide insight to understand the mechanisms of drug resistance, identify promising therapeutic opportunities, and facilitate personalized treatment. Estrogen receptor (ER) positive and ER negative breast cancer have distinct clinical behavior and molecular properties. However, to date, few studies have rigorously assessed drug response genes in them. In this study, our goal was to systematically identify genes associated with multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer cell lines. We tested 27 human breast cell lines for response to seven chemotherapeutic agents (cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel). We integrated publicly available gene expression profiles of these cell lines with their in vitro drug response patterns, then applied meta-analysis to identify genes related to multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative cells separately. One hundred eighty-eight genes were identified as related to multidrug response in ER positive and 32 genes in ER negative breast cell lines. Of these, only three genes (DBI, TOP2A, and PMVK) were common to both cell types. TOP2A was positively associated with drug response, and DBI was negatively associated with drug response. Interestingly, PMVK was positively associated with drug response in ER positive cells and negatively in ER negative cells. Functional analysis showed that while cell cycle affects drug response in both ER positive and negative cells, most biological processes that are involved in drug response are distinct. A number of signaling pathways that are uniquely enriched in ER positive cells have complex cross talk with ER signaling, while in ER negative cells, enriched pathways are related to metabolic functions. Taken together, our analysis indicates that distinct mechanisms are involved in multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative breast cells.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCluster AnalysisDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, NeoplasmHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPrincipal Component AnalysisReceptors, EstrogenSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID22815861
PMCPMC3397945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.