ArticlePloS one2012
Distinct genes related to drug response identified in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer cell lines.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer and its embedded mechanism: breast cancer resistance to conventional drugs and related therapies, a review.Open biology · 2024Review
- Identification of a cholesterol metabolism-related prognostic signature for multiple myeloma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Identification and panoramic analysis of drug response-related genes in triple negative breast cancer using as an example NVP-BEZ235.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- MicroRNA-874 targets phosphomevalonate kinase and inhibits cancer cell growth via the mevalonate pathway.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Clinical observation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pyrotinib plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: a cohort study.Gland surgery · 2021Article
- Enzymes in the Cholesterol Synthesis Pathway: Interactomics in the Cancer Context.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Proteomic Discovery of Biomarkers to Predict Prognosis of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.Cancers · 2020Article
- Article
- CXCL1 stimulates migration and invasion in ER‑negative breast cancer cells via activation of the ERK/MMP2/9 signaling axis.International journal of oncology · 2019Article
- Article
- Identifying differentially expressed genes from cross-site integrated data based on relative expression orderings.International journal of biological sciences · 2018Article
- Use of ChemoFx® for Identification of Effective Treatments in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.PLoS currents · 2015Article
- Does estrogen receptor determination affect prognosis in early stage breast cancers?International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Antitumor mechanisms of S-allyl mercaptocysteine for breast cancer therapy.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2014Article
- Purvalanol A is a strong apoptotic inducer via activating polyamine catabolic pathway in MCF-7 estrogen receptor positive breast cancer cells.Molecular biology reports · 2014Article
- Cancer subtype discovery and biomarker identification via a new robust network clustering algorithm.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer patients have different responses to chemotherapeutic treatments. Genes associated with drug response can provide insight to understand the mechanisms of drug resistance, identify promising therapeutic opportunities, and facilitate personalized treatment. Estrogen receptor (ER) positive and ER negative breast cancer have distinct clinical behavior and molecular properties. However, to date, few studies have rigorously assessed drug response genes in them. In this study, our goal was to systematically identify genes associated with multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer cell lines. We tested 27 human breast cell lines for response to seven chemotherapeutic agents (cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel). We integrated publicly available gene expression profiles of these cell lines with their in vitro drug response patterns, then applied meta-analysis to identify genes related to multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative cells separately. One hundred eighty-eight genes were identified as related to multidrug response in ER positive and 32 genes in ER negative breast cell lines. Of these, only three genes (DBI, TOP2A, and PMVK) were common to both cell types. TOP2A was positively associated with drug response, and DBI was negatively associated with drug response. Interestingly, PMVK was positively associated with drug response in ER positive cells and negatively in ER negative cells. Functional analysis showed that while cell cycle affects drug response in both ER positive and negative cells, most biological processes that are involved in drug response are distinct. A number of signaling pathways that are uniquely enriched in ER positive cells have complex cross talk with ER signaling, while in ER negative cells, enriched pathways are related to metabolic functions. Taken together, our analysis indicates that distinct mechanisms are involved in multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative breast cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.