Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22815677›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2012

Association between the ERCC5 Asp1104His polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Mei-Ling Zhu, Mengyun Wang, Zhi-Gang Cao, Jing He, Ting-Yan Shi, Kai-Qin Xia, Li-Xin Qiu, Qing-Yi Wei

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Aging · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Genetic association between ERCC5 rs17655 polymorphism and lung cancer risk: evidence based on a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. American journal of translational research · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Polymorphisms inJournal of Cancer · 2018
    Article
  18. Oncotarget · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mei-Ling ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Mengyun Wang
Zhi-Gang Cao
Jing He
Ting-Yan Shi
Kai-Qin Xia
Li-Xin Qiu
Qing-Yi Wei
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcision repair cross complementing group 5 (ERCC5 or XPG) plays an important role in regulating DNA excision repair, removal of bulky lesions caused by environmental chemicals or UV light. Mutations in this gene cause a rare autosomal recessive syndrome, and its functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may alter DNA repair capacity phenotype and cancer risk. However, a series of epidemiological studies on the association between the ERCC5 Asp1104His polymorphism (rs17655, G>C) and cancer susceptibility generated conflicting results. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo derive a more precise estimation of the association between the ERCC5 Asp1104His polymorphism and overall cancer risk, we performed a meta-analysis of 44 published case-control studies, in which a total of 23,490 cases and 27,168 controls were included. To provide additional biological plausibility, we also assessed the genotype-gene expression correlation from the HapMap phase II release 23 data with 270 individuals from 4 ethnic populations. When all studies were pooled, we found no statistical evidence for a significantly increased cancer risk in the recessive genetic models (His/His vs. Asp/Asp: OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.92-1.06, P = 0.242 for heterogeneity or His/His vs. Asp/His + Asp/Asp: OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.03, P = 0.260 for heterogeneity), nor in further stratified analyses by cancer type, ethnicity, source of controls and sample size. In the genotype-phenotype correlation analysis from 270 individuals, we consistently found no significant correlation of the Asp1104His polymorphism with ERCC5 mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This meta-analysis suggests that it is unlikely that the ERCC5 Asp1104His polymorphism may contribute to individual susceptibility to cancer risk.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Excision Repair Protein ERCC-5EndonucleasesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Excision Repair Protein ERCC-5EndonucleasesNuclear ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22815677
PMCPMC3399856
OpenAlexW2095368910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.