Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22815497›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

A retinal source of spatial contrast gain control.

Benjamin Scholl, Kenneth W Latimer, Nicholas J Priebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Contrast gain control and retinogeniculate communication.The European journal of neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin SchollCenter for Perceptual Systems, Section of Neurobiology, School of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
Kenneth W Latimer
Nicholas J Priebe

Funding

CPS Training ProgramT32EY021462 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Mary M Hayhoe, Alexander C Huk · 2012 to 2026
$2.5M
Cortical Integration of Binocular InputR01EY019288 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRIEBE, NICHOLAS J · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS EY-019288NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019288NEI NIH HHS T32 EY021462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory cortex is able to encode a broad range of stimulus features despite a great variation in signal strength. In cat primary visual cortex (V1), for example, neurons are able to extract stimulus features like orientation or spatial configuration over a wide range of stimulus contrasts. The contrast-invariant spatial tuning found in V1 neuron responses has been modeled as a gain control mechanism, but at which stage of the visual pathway it emerges has remained unclear. Here we describe our findings that contrast-invariant spatial tuning occurs not only in the responses of lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) relay cells but also in their afferent retinal input. Our evidence suggests that a similar contrast-invariant mechanism is found throughout the stages of the early visual pathway, and that the contrast-invariant spatial selectivity is evident in both retinal ganglion cell and LGN cell responses.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCatsContrast SensitivityFemaleGeniculate BodiesMaleNeuronsOrientationPhotic StimulationRetinaSpace PerceptionVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID22815497
PMCPMC3432019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.