ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics. [corrected].
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reconstructing and comparing signal transduction networks from single-cell protein quantification data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Neuroblastoma signalling models unveil combination therapies targeting feedback-mediated resistance.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Exploiting network topology for large-scale inference of nonlinear reaction models.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
- Reconstructing phosphorylation signalling networks from quantitative phosphoproteomic data.Essays in biochemistry · 2018Review
- Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
motivationNetwork inference approaches are widely used to shed light on regulatory interplay between molecular players such as genes and proteins. Biochemical processes underlying networks of interest (e.g. gene regulatory or protein signalling networks) are generally nonlinear. In many settings, knowledge is available concerning relevant chemical kinetics. However, existing network inference methods for continuous, steady-state data are typically rooted in statistical formulations, which do not exploit chemical kinetics to guide inference.
resultsHerein, we present an approach to network inference for steady-state data that is rooted in non-linear descriptions of biochemical mechanism. We use equilibrium analysis of chemical kinetics to obtain functional forms that are in turn used to infer networks using steady-state data. The approach we propose is directly applicable to conventional steady-state gene expression or proteomic data and does not require knowledge of either network topology or any kinetic parameters. We illustrate the approach in the context of protein phosphorylation networks, using data simulated from a recent mechanistic model and proteomic data from cancer cell lines. In the former, the true network is known and used for assessment, whereas in the latter, results are compared against known biochemistry. We find that the proposed methodology is more effective at estimating network topology than methods based on linear models. AVAILABILITY: mukherjeelab.nki.nl/CODE/GK_Kinetics.zip CONTACT: c.j.oates@warwick.ac.uk; s.mukherjee@nki.nl SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.