Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22815298›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2012

Effect of pramlintide on prandial glycemic excursions during closed-loop control in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes.

Stuart A Weinzimer, Jennifer L Sherr, Eda Cengiz, Grace Kim, Jessica L Ruiz, Lori Carria, Gayane Voskanyan, Anirban Roy, William V Tamborlane

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Bolusing frequency and amount impacts glucose control during hybrid closed-loop.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2018
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Adjunctive Therapies to Optimize Closed-loop Glucose Control.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart A WeinzimerDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. stuart.weinzimer@yale.edu
Jennifer L Sherr
Eda Cengiz
Grace Kim
Jessica L Ruiz
Lori Carria
Gayane Voskanyan
Anirban Roy
William V Tamborlane
Yale University · USMedtronic (United States) · US

Funding

YALE UNIVERSITY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD PROGRAMUL1RR024139 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2006 to 2011
$56.8M
Yale Diabetes Research CenterP30DK045735 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GERALD I SHULMAN · 1993 to 2026
$44.0M
Career Development Programs in Diabetes Research for Pediatrics EndocrinologistsK12DK094714 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAMBORLANE, WILLIAM V · 2011 to 2020
$4.3M
Closed-Loop Effectiveness and Ambulatory Regimens (CLEAR)R01DK085618 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WEINZIMER, STUART ALAN · 2009 to 2013
$3.5M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024139NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR-024139NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK094714NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK045735NIDDK NIH HHS P30-DK-045735NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085618NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK-085618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEven under closed-loop (CL) conditions, meal-related blood glucose (BG) excursions frequently exceed target levels as a result of delays in absorption of insulin from the subcutaneous site of infusion. We hypothesized that delaying gastric emptying with preprandial injections of pramlintide would improve postprandial glycemia by allowing a better match between carbohydrate and insulin absorptions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsEight subjects (4 female; age, 15-28 years; A1C, 7.5 ± 0.7%) were studied for 48 h on a CL insulin-delivery system with a proportional integral derivative algorithm with insulin feedback: 24 h on CL control alone (CL) and 24 h on CL control plus 30-μg premeal injections of pramlintide (CLP). Target glucose was set at 120 mg/dL; timing and contents of meals were identical on both study days. No premeal manual boluses were given. Differences in reference BG excursions, defined as the incremental glucose rise from premeal to peak, were compared between conditions for each meal.

resultsCLP was associated with overall delayed time to peak BG (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 h; P < 0.0001) and reduced magnitude of glycemic excursion (88 ± 42 vs. 113 ± 32 mg/dL; P = 0.006) compared with CL alone. Pramlintide effects on glycemic excursions were particularly evident at lunch and dinner, in association with higher premeal insulin concentrations at those mealtimes.

conclusionsPramlintide delayed the time to peak postprandial BG and reduced the magnitude of prandial BG excursions. Beneficial effects of pramlintide on CL may in part be related to higher premeal insulin levels at lunch and dinner compared with breakfast.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinIslet Amyloid PolypeptideMaleMealsPancreas, ArtificialPostprandial PeriodBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinIslet Amyloid Polypeptidepramlintide

Identifiers

PMID22815298
PMCPMC3447854
OpenAlexW1988037127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.