ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2012
C-KIT mutations were closely associated with the response to Imatinib in Chinese advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological significance of c-KIT mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2015Pooled it
- Practical role of mutation analysis for imatinib treatment in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, somatic mutations and candidate genetic risk variants.PloS one · 2013Trial
- Bioinformatic analysis of KIT juxtamembrane domain mutations in Syrian GIST patients: jigsaw puzzle completed.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- A novel fusion between CDC42BPB and ALK in a patient with quadruple wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022Article
- Mutational landscape of thymic epithelial tumors in a Chinese population: insights into potential clinical implications.Gland surgery · 2021Article
- Imatinib-induced ophthalmological side-effects in GIST patients are associated with the variations of EGFR, SLC22A1, SLC22A5 and ABCB1.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2018Article
- Asian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.Cancer research and treatment · 2016Article
- Risk prediction for early-onset gastric carcinoma: a case-control study of polygenic gastric cancer in Han Chinese with hereditary background.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Intratumoral KIT mutational heterogeneity and recurrent KIT/ PDGFRA mutations in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- A meta-analysis of prognostic value of KIT mutation status in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the correlation between C-KIT/PDGFRα mutations and Imatinib response or survival in Chinese advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Clinical data and paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were collected from 158 advanced GIST patients receiving first-line Imatinib. Mutation analyses of C-KIT gene (Exons 9, 11, 13, and 17) and PDGFRα gene (exons 12 and 18) were performed by PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing. A total of 135 patients harboring C-KIT mutations (exon 11 mutation: 108; exon 9 mutation: 23; exon 13 mutation: 2; exon 17 mutation: 2) and one patients carrying PDGFRα mutation (exon 18) were found in this study. Twenty-two patients (13.9 %) with neither C-KIT nor PDGFRα mutations were named as wild type. The response rate (64.7 vs. 36.4 %, P = 0.000) and median progression-free survival (28 vs. 8 months, P = 0.000) of mutant patients (n = 136) were significantly higher than those of wild-type patients (n = 22). Moreover, the response rate and median progression-free survival in patients with exon 11 mutations (n = 108), exon 9 mutations (n = 23), and wild-type patients (n = 22) were 68.5, 47.8, and 36.4 % (P = 0.001), and 31 months, 13 months, and 8 months (P = 0.000), respectively. No significant differences of response rate or median progression-free survival were seen in patients with exon 11 deletion mutations, point mutations, and mixed-type mutations. C-KIT mutations were closely associated with Imatinib response and progression-free survival of Chinese advanced GIST patients. Other predictive markers for Imatinib would be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.