ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2012
[Subretinal surgery for massive hemorrhage].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Heavy liquids as intraoperative instrument in retinal surgery].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subretinal massive hemorrhage due to exsudative age-related macular degeneration remains a challenging field for submacular surgery. While small hemorrhages can be easily displaced by various pneumatic techniques the correct strategy for massive subretinal bleeding is still under debate. This article reviews the different techniques for these severe cases and assesses the visual prognosis and potential complications. In general, invasive techniques for extraction of the neovascular membrane with or without macular translocation or retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) choroidal patch translocation have the potential to achieve visual improvement. However, the risk of severe visual loss due to subsequent complications has to be considered. Far better visual results with a significantly lower complication rate can be achieved by a 2-step strategy using rTPA-assisted dissolution of the hemorrhage and evacuation of the liquefied clot via a small retinotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.