Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22814579›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2012

Expression and prognostic significance of Src family members in renal clear cell carcinoma.

T Qayyum, P A McArdle, G W Lamb, F Jordan, C Orange, M Seywright, P G Horgan, R J Jones, G Oades, M A Aitchison and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anticancer activities of selected Emirati Date (Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antitumor activity of irradiated riboflavin on human renal carcinoma cell line 786-O.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

T QayyumUnit of Experimental Therapeutics, Institute of Cancer, College of MVLS, University of Glasgow, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK. tahir1@doctors.org.uk
P A McArdle
G W Lamb
F Jordan
C Orange
M Seywright
P G Horgan
R J Jones
G Oades
M A Aitchison
J Edwards
Gartnavel General Hospital · GBWestern Infirmary · GBGlasgow Life · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to determine whether Src family kinases (SFK) are expressed in renal cell cancer and to assess their prognostic significance.

methodsmRNA expression levels were investigated for the 8 SFK members by quantitative real-time PCR in 19 clear cell cancer tissue samples. Immunohistochemical staining was utilised to assess expression of Src kinase, dephosphorylated Src kinase at Y(530) (SrcY(530)), phosphorylated Src at Y(419) (SrcY(419)) and the downstream focal adhesion kinase (FAK) marker at the Y(861) site (FAK Y(861)) in a cohort of 57 clear cell renal cancer specimens. Expression was assessed using the weighted histoscore method.

resultsSrc, Lyn, Hck, Fgr and Fyn were the most highly expressed in renal cancer. All members were more highly expressed in T2 disease, and furthermore expression levels between T2 and T3 disease showed a significant decrease for Lck, Lyn, Fyn, Blk and Yes (P=0.032). Assessment of membrane, cytoplasm and nuclear expression of Src kinase, SrcY(530) and SrcY(419) were not significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. High expression of cytoplasmic FAK Y(861) was associated with decreased cancer-specific survival (P=0.001). On multivariate analysis, cytoplasmic FAK Y(861) was independently associated with cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 3.35, 95% CI 1.40-7.98, P=0.006).

conclusionWe have reported that all SFK members are expressed in renal cell carcinoma. The SFK members had their highest levels of expression before the disease no longer being organ confined. We hypothesise that these SFK members are upregulated before the cancer spreading out-with the organ and given that Src itself is not associated with cancer-specific survival but the presence of FAK Y(861), a downstream marker for SFK member activity is associated with decreased cancer-specific survival, we hypothesise that another SFK member is associated with decreased cancer-specific survival in renal cell cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Renal CellCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Messengersrc-Family KinasesRNA, Messengersrc-Family Kinases

Identifiers

PMID22814579
PMCPMC3426751
OpenAlexW2023249455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.