ArticleVision research2012
Responses to second-order texture modulations undergo surround suppression.
Article in Vision research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Normalization by orientation-tuned surround in human V1-V3.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Flexible contextual modulation of naturalistic texture perception in peripheral vision.Journal of vision · 2021Review
- Cascaded Amplitude Modulations in Sound Texture Perception.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Article
- GABA predicts visual intelligence.Neuroscience letters · 2016Article
- Testing the odds of inherent vs. observed overdispersion in neural spike counts.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Motion area V5/MT+ response to global motion in the absence of V1 resembles early visual cortex.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2015Article
- Exploration of complex visual feature spaces for object perception.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
- Orientation-cue invariant population responses to contrast-modulated and phase-reversed contour stimuli in macaque V1 and V2.PloS one · 2014Article
- A two-stage cascade model of BOLD responses in human visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
First-order (contrast) surround suppression has been well characterized both psychophysically and physiologically,but relatively little is known as to whether the perception of second-order visual stimuli exhibits analogous center–surround interactions. Second-order surround suppression was characterized by requiring subjects to detect second-order modulation in stimuli presented alone or embedded in a surround.Both contrast- (CM) and orientation-modulated (OM) stimuli were used. For most subjects and both OM and CM stimuli, second-order surrounds caused thresholds to be higher, indicative of second-order suppression. For CM stimuli, suppression was orientation-specific, i.e., higher thresholds for parallel than for orthogonal surrounds. However, the evidence for orientation specificity of suppression for OM stimuli was weaker. These results suggest that normalization, leading to surround suppression, operates at multiple stages in cortical processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.