Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22811842›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2011

Current surgical management of pancreatic cancer.

Charles B Kim, Shuja Ahmed, Eddy C Hsueh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Post pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage: A retrospective analysis of incidence, risk factors and outcome.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy.Clinical liver disease · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles B KimDepartment of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Shuja Ahmed
Eddy C Hsueh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

En bloc resection is the treatment of choice for localized pancreatic cancer. While the perioperative mortality associated with resection is low, it still carries a significant morbidity rate of up to 50% in certain high-risk subsets of patients. With advances in perioperative care, radical resection with inclusion of adjacent vascular structure to achieve negative margin status can be performed with comparable mortality and morbidity in high-volume centers. Early results with the use of minimally invasive technique in pancreatic surgery are promising. Recent data on perioperative care to decrease morbidity with pancreatic surgery will also be discussed.

Indexed as

distal pancreatectomylaparoscopic pancreatic surgeryPancreaticodoudenectomy

Identifiers

PMID22811842
PMCPMC3397614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.