ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2012
Renewing the respect for similarity.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual stream connectivity predicts assessments of image quality.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- The computational origin of representation.Minds and machines · 2021Article
- A Systematic Framework for Olfactory Bulb Signal Transformations.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- A method for real-time visual stimulus selection in the study of cortical object perception.NeuroImage · 2016Article
- Spaces in the Brain: From Neurons to Meanings.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Review
- Varieties of perceptual truth and their possible evolutionary roots.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2015Article
- Neuronal Correlates of Cognitive Control during Gaming Revealed by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.PloS one · 2015Article
- The eyes grasp, the hands see: metric category knowledge transfers between vision and touch.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2014Article
- Exploration of complex visual feature spaces for object perception.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
- Exploiting object constancy: effects of active exploration and shape morphing on similarity judgments of novel objects.Experimental brain research · 2013Article
- Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition.Journal of vision · 2013Article
- Examining similarity structure: multidimensional scaling and related approaches in neuroimaging.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013Review
- Invariant recognition of visual objects: some emerging computational principles.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In psychology, the concept of similarity has traditionally evoked a mixture of respect, stemming from its ubiquity and intuitive appeal, and concern, due to its dependence on the framing of the problem at hand and on its context. We argue for a renewed focus on similarity as an explanatory concept, by surveying established results and new developments in the theory and methods of similarity-preserving associative lookup and dimensionality reduction-critical components of many cognitive functions, as well as of intelligent data management in computer vision. We focus in particular on the growing family of algorithms that support associative memory by performing hashing that respects local similarity, and on the uses of similarity in representing structured objects and scenes. Insofar as these similarity-based ideas and methods are useful in cognitive modeling and in AI applications, they should be included in the core conceptual toolkit of computational neuroscience. In support of this stance, the present paper (1) offers a discussion of conceptual, mathematical, computational, and empirical aspects of similarity, as applied to the problems of visual object and scene representation, recognition, and interpretation, (2) mentions some key computational problems arising in attempts to put similarity to use, along with their possible solutions, (3) briefly states a previously developed similarity-based framework for visual object representation, the Chorus of Prototypes, along with the empirical support it enjoys, (4) presents new mathematical insights into the effectiveness of this framework, derived from its relationship to locality-sensitive hashing (LSH) and to concomitant statistics, (5) introduces a new model, the Chorus of Relational Descriptors (ChoRD), that extends this framework to scene representation and interpretation, (6) describes its implementation and testing, and finally (7) suggests possible directions in which the present research program can be extended in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.