Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22811618›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biological sciences2012

Complexities of TGF-β targeted cancer therapy.

Erin C Connolly, Julia Freimuth, Rosemary J Akhurst

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed, 355 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin C ConnollyUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, California 94143-0512, USA.
Julia Freimuth
Rosemary J Akhurst
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Tissue and Outcomes CoreP50CA058207 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 1992 to 2012
$32.7M
Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms in CancerT32CA108462 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GOGA, ANDREI · 2004 to 2024
$10.4M
TGFBM2 in Development and DiseaseR01GM060514 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AKHURST, ROSEMARY J · 2001 to 2012
$2.9M
"Genetic interactions between Tgfb1 and Skts15/Tgfbm3 in cancer"R01CA116019 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AKHURST, ROSEMARY J · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
Acquired Resistance to TGFBR1 inhibitors and cancer stem cell outgrowthR21CA164772 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AKHURST, ROSEMARY J · 2012 to 2013
$360k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058207NCI NIH HHS P50-CA58207NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116019NCI NIH HHS R01-CA116019NCI NIH HHS R21 CA164772NCI NIH HHS R21-CA164772NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108462NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060514NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM060514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many advanced tumors produce excessive amounts of Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) which, in normal epithelial cells, is a potent growth inhibitor. However, in oncogenically activated cells, the homeostatic action of TGF-β is often diverted along alternative pathways. Hence, TGF-β signaling elicits protective or tumor suppressive effects during the early growth-sensitive stages of tumorigenesis. However, later in tumor development when carcinoma cells become refractory to TGF-β-mediated growth inhibition, the tumor cell responds by stimulating pathways with tumor progressing effects. At late stages of malignancy, tumor progression is driven by TGF-β overload. The tumor microenvironment is a target of TGF-β action that stimulates tumor progression via pro-tumorigenic effects on vascular, immune, and fibroblastic cells. Bone is one of the richest sources of TGF-β in the body and a common site for dissemination of breast cancer metastases. Osteoclastic degradation of bone matrix, which accompanies establishment and growth of metastases, triggers further release of bone-derived TGF-β. This leads to a vicious positive feedback of tumor progression, driven by ever increasing levels of TGF-β released from both the tumor and bone matrix. It is for this reason, that pharmaceutical companies have developed therapeutic agents that block TGF-β signaling. Nonetheless, the choice of drug design and dosing strategy can affect the efficacy of TGF-β therapeutics. This review will describe pre-clinical and clinical data of four major classes of TGF-β inhibitor, namely i) ligand traps, ii) antisense oligonucleotides, iii) receptor kinase inhibitors and iv) peptide aptamers. Long term dosing strategies with TGF-β inhibitors may be ill-advised, since this class of drug has potentially highly pleiotropic activity, and development of drug resistance might potentiate tumor progression. Current paradigms for the use of TGF-β inhibitors in oncology have therefore moved towards the use of combinatorial therapies and short term dosing, with considerable promise for the clinic.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsTransforming Growth Factor betaAntineoplastic AgentsTransforming Growth Factor betaTransforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)

Identifiers

PMID22811618
PMCPMC3399319
OpenAlexW2130643308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.