Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22810810›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2012

The rationale for targeting the LOX family in cancer.

Holly E Barker, Thomas R Cox, Janine T Erler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 358 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
358citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

358 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 564 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Toward targeted therapeutics for lobular breast cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Collagen remodeling in breast cancer progression: from molecular mechanisms to diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rethinking Oxidative Stress inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Role of cuproptosis in digestive system tumors (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  20. LOX and LOXL2 Expression in Canine Mammary Carcinomas.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2026
    Article

298 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Holly E BarkerHypoxia & Metastasis Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK.
Thomas R Cox
Janine T Erler
Institute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic targeting of extracellular proteins is becoming hugely attractive in light of evidence implicating the tumour microenvironment as pivotal in all aspects of tumour initiation and progression. Members of the lysyl oxidase (LOX) family of proteins are secreted by tumours and are the subject of much effort to understand their roles in cancer. In this Review we discuss the roles of members of this family in the remodelling of the tumour microenvironment and their paradoxical roles in tumorigenesis and metastasis. We also discuss how targeting this family of proteins might lead to a new avenue of cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsProtein-Lysine 6-OxidaseTumor MicroenvironmentProtein-Lysine 6-Oxidase

Identifiers

PMID22810810
OpenAlexW2055801606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.