Prenatal diagnostics: Fetal genes in mother's blood.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cell Communication-mediated Nonself-Recognition and -Intolerance in Representative Species of the Animal Kingdom.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020
   Review
2. Detection of Innate and Artificial Mitochondrial DNA Heteroplasmy by Massively Parallel Sequencing: Considerations for Analysis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018
   Article
3. Circulating Cell Free DNA in the Diagnosis of Trophoblastic Tumors.EBioMedicine · 2016
   Article
4. Amniotic Epithelial Cells: A New Tool to Combat Aging and Age-Related Diseases?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2016
   Article
5. Ethical, legal, social, and policy implications of behavioral genetics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2013
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Non-invasive prenatal measurement of the fetal genome.2012

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as