Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22810215›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2012

[Clinical pain consultation. Profiles of clinical pain consultation and requirements for management of complex pain patients in inpatient care].

J Erlenwein, J Schlink, M Pfingsten, F Petzke

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J ErlenweinSchmerz-Tagesklinik und -Ambulanz, Zentrum Anaesthesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. joachim.erlenwein@med.uni-goettingen.de
J Schlink
M Pfingsten
F Petzke
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this investigation was to describe the performance profile and the requirements for the management of complex pain patients for the structures of a consultation service. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe content and number of all inpatient consultations of the pain department (as an independent service in addition to acute pain and palliative care services) were evaluated for the period from 2008-2010.

resultsDuring the study, 1,391 contacts were made in 882 patients; in approx. 50% of the consultations diagnostic or specific (interventional) procedures were requested. Beside additional diagnostic tests, physiotherapy (19.2%), psychological and psychiatric care (11.1%), and other therapeutic approaches (e.g., mirror therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, progressive muscle relaxation) or the long-term follow-up in specialized pain service (20.5%) were recommended.

conclusionWithin the scope of the pain consultation, a wide spectrum of pain diagnoses and difficult patients are examined. Mixed forms of acute, chronic, and tumor-related pain are often present. Therapeutically, optimization of only the pharmacological regimen is often not sufficient. Similar requirements for a multimodal diagnosis and therapeutic concept as established in ambulatory and/or specialist care are ultimately needed.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamReferral and ConsultationAcute PainAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChronic PainCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMale

Identifiers

PMID22810215
OpenAlexW2416357085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.